Taiwan's relationship to the international news media outlets that write about it is that of an island to a mainland. The island, of course, is Taiwan, and the mainland is the news media. They control the news, they define the words, they print the print.
Most news outlets around the world continue to play the game of appeasing China by pretending that Taiwan is a mere island and not a nation, and they routinely send out news bulletins, editorials and multipage feature articles referring to this bustling nation as a mere "island." From the Associated Press to Reuters, from the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times, from BBC to Le Monde, Taiwan is just an island, and never a country.
When asked why, a high-placed editor in New York once told this writer: "We must remain neutral and not take sides."
But one must counter that argument with this question: Just how does referring to Taiwan as an island and not as a nation in print make an international news agency "neutral"?
Every once in a while, however, small victories for Taiwan's nationhood pop up in the international press, and it happened again just the other day in that now-famous profile of New York Yankees star pitcher Wang Chien-ming (王建民) that made headlines around the world.
The reporter, Tyler Kepner, an American staff writer at the New York Times, did an end-run around his copy desk masters in Manhattan and was able to call Taiwan a "country" in the published article, writing: "At 26, [Wang] is a national hero in his home country."
The Times reporter did not say "home island" or "home province," as the propaganda ministers in China would have preferred. Kepner called Taiwan a country in the prestigious pages of the New York Times. Score another victory for Taiwan as it advances its agenda on the world scene. A minor victory, an almost invisible victory, and one that no doubt will be met by complaints and an angry letter to the Times' editors from China's ambassador to the UN in New York, but a victory nevertheless.
According to the copy desk at the New York Times in Manhattan, Taiwan is not to be referred to as a country or a nation or even an island nation, except in a quoted comment by a person being interviewed. The Times' reporters themselves are commanded to refer to Taiwan in every instance as an island and never a country. It is a written rule of the newsroom, re-examined every few years, but never changed.
Kepner, in his insightful profile of Wang, didn't follow the rules of the newsroom and managed to get in that one small reference to Taiwan as a "country."
Imagine, Wang actually comes from a country, a real nation, not some imaginary island province off the coast of some equally imaginary "mainland."
Sports has often served to further the agenda of freedom and liberty in the international community, and the recent New York Times article pushed the heavy stone of Taiwan's profile up the hill just a few inches, and those inches count. Thank you, Tyler Kepner.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer in Chiayi.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
RSS