There's nothing more unpleasant than having your hopes built up only to have them crushed by malice or incompetence. Thirty teams have been knocked out of the running for the 2006 FIFA World Cup trophy, and each has felt these emotions at some juncture. Sometimes the villain is a cheating opposition player, an inattentive referee, or even one's own players. But it is even more galling if the villain is team management (such as for the hapless Togo side), whose job it is to predict and avoid pitfalls.
In his latest weekly e-newsletter, President Chen Shui-bian (
This kind of hyperbole would be acceptable if it was backed up by serious reform and an insight into the problems that keep Taiwan from rising to a more respectable ranking than 156th in the world.
Chen's grand dream is merely that. Sending 20 -- yes, 20 -- children under the age of 10 to Brazil for specialist training with a less-than-generous stipend is apparently all it takes to get Taiwan into the top 32 teams in the world, or, at least, the top five in Asia.
Chen's proposal seems to have been made in a vacuum (why Brazil? Why not France or Italy?). He made no mention of the troubles facing local soccer administrators and why so much money earmarked for sports ends up in places either unknown or unnecessary. He seems oblivious for the need to grow a soccer culture and corporatizing the result.
If Chen had taken any notice of this year's World Cup, he would also have appreciated the importance of coaching and team management, and he would have deduced that what Taiwan needs is a team of administrators that knows what it is doing and has a vision for the nation's players.
What this amounts to is not just hiring a Japanese to coach the slovenly national side (the men, that is; the women's side performs rather better in competition). It requires bringing in -- at some expense -- a team of professionals from outside Taiwan who can lay the foundations for decades to come, including training local administrators, selectors, promoters and everyone else.
It also amounts to Taiwan exploiting its unusual wealth in the region and launching an invitational competition that brings together Asian teams of about the same standard so that there is some level of competitive spectacle (call it the Taiwan Cup or the Formosa Cup, perhaps, but certainly not the Republic of China Cup). This would boost the confidence of Taiwanese players and fans, and push up the level of soccer among the minnows of Asia.
But we got none of this. Instead, Chen's policy is one of superficial flag-waving and throwing money at substance-free development programs. The nation deserves better than late night free-associating written up by Chen's staffers for Internet consumption.
The 2006 World Cup has been notable for the de-emphasis on brilliant individual play and the importance of well-drilled team soccer. Italy, Germany, France, Switzerland, Australia and Ghana all performed above expectation because of their team game -- in defense or attack.
Chen's fantasies have coincided with the indictment of former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (
Whether it be making up policy on the run for a sport about which he knows nothing, or employing aides about whose unsuitability for the job he knew nothing, Chen is demonstrating that his lame duck presidency is in part a creature of his own making. As president, you need a well-drilled team, or you'll be knocked out.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
RSS