A good leader understands that everyone learns differently. A bad leader thinks everyone should learn the way he or she does. The "my way or the highway" style of leadership, as manifested in Taiwan's daily political wrestling between the governing and the opposition parties, should already be seen as a thing of the past.
However, few people really appreciate the importance of the public's craving for political stability when it comes to their own survival or self-interests. Recent flip-flops between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) on how to proceed with the campaign against President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) illustrate not only the internal contradictions within the pan-blue camp but also a severe disconnect with what the public really wants. Now that the recall motion has failed, each party has been taking advantage of the anti-Chen campaign to maximize its own interests or at least to minimize its own damage.
Aside from the incapacity of the Legislative Yuan to reach the two-thirds threshold required for recalling the president, Chen survived the motion largely because of a split between KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜).
Ma's flirtation with Soong's more radical approach to oust Chen led to a decline in his approval rating to less 50 percent -- the lowest approval rating he has received since taking over the KMT chairmanship last July.
Soong's popularity plunged, too. However, as a potential candidate for the upcoming Taipei mayoral election, Soong's extremist agenda of bringing down Chen or his government at any cost successfully captured the media's attention. Soong's political maneuvering was aimed mostly at shoring-up hard-core pan-blue camp supporters and was pursued irrespective of its impact on the PFP.
Soong's obstructionism is a product of Taiwan's still immature democracy. Soong's argument after the recall vote that "a minority of pan-green legislators have hijacked the will of Taiwan's 23 million people to force Chen to step down" not only lacked legitimacy but also displayed huge disrespect for the Constitution.
After the recall motion most politicians called for a truce and an end to political confrontation -- except Soong. Even Ma re-orientated the KMT's strategy and distanced himself from Soong's extremism. Both Ma and the pan-green leaders understand that the public has sent a clear message to all political leaders. That is, political stability and economic order are what they are most concerned about. Conflict and hostility between the governing and the opposition parties should end and no single politician should ever take advantage of political circumstances to suit their own narrow self interest.
Now's the time to get back to work. Taiwanese are wiser now in the wake of the scandals related to Chen's aides and family members. The public knows how to flex their muscles if the incumbent leader fails to live up to his promises. It is also suspicious of the green-blue division and is reluctant to became a tool of mobilization by certain politicians.
Finally, the public is confident enough now to respect Taiwan's democratic system, committed to playing by the constitutional rules and avoiding moves that would destabilize the government.
A smart leader is one who knows how to incorporate discipline and a high-standard of morality into governance. Further, a smart leader is pragmatic and will put aside partisan interests to serve the public.
Obstructionism or extremism in Taiwan politics will only be despised. This is the lesson that all politicians must draw from the recall fiasco.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this