It is easy to condemn the reckless and destabilizing behavior of North Korea. The regime of ruthless dictator Kim Jong-il has done little to elicit sympathy from anyone who has compassion for that brutalized population or concern for the well-being of the millions of people in the region whose lives he has endangered.
But it is difficult to propose a solution to this continuing problem. Why is that so? Why have years of talks ended fruitlessly? Why have threats, promises, enticements and material rewards had no effect on the behavior of the dictator in Pyongyang?
While Tokyo has been busy lobbying the region to censure Pyongyang over the tests and to back sanctions against the North Korean regime, and while the US has been busy setting up a UN Security Council meeting on the matter, what has China's response been?
"China and North Korea are friendly neighbors," said a spokeswoman for the Chinese foreign ministry.
"North Korea's firing of missiles has no relationship with China," the spokeswoman later said, adding: "We hope to see diplomatic tensions resolved through diplomatic efforts and resolve problems through dialogue and consultation."
If insincere banalities can resolve intractable international security issues, then China is doing a wonderful job of dealing with Pyongyang. If Beijing sincerely believes that North Korea's actions have "no relationship with China," then why is it involved in the Six Party talks at all?
Exactly when will the international community recognize that the key to solving the North Korea problem is to bring pressure to bear on Beijing, not Pyongyang?
North Korea is a basket case of a country where human beings are treated as less than chattel and the economy is based primarily on foreign aid donations. How could such a travesty of a nation stand without support from China?
It isn't exactly a secret that most of North Korea's missile and nuclear technology was obtained from or with the assistance of China. And one doesn't need to be an expert in international relations to understand that Beijing is using Pyongyang as a tool to serve its own ends. The mystery is why the international community is allowing this state of affairs to continue.
The Six Party talks have been a failure. Of the countries involved, only two actually see North Korea as a threat: Japan and the US. South Korea's policy toward its northern neighbor is simply too mired in internal politics to be of any use on an international level. Russia is taking part -- to borrow a phrase from George Mallory -- "because it's there."
And China does not want the situation resolved. The ongoing "crisis" is much more useful to Beijing as a vehicle it can use to portray itself as a regional player. North Korea also complicates and frustrates the US in its role as guarantor of regional security, enabling Beijing to set the stage for its own rise to regional power.
What is needed is an alliance of regional states with shared values and interests. In short, what is needed is a regional alliance of democracies with real security clout.
It may seem hopelessly naive to envision an organization in the Asia-Pacific region that works along the lines of NATO, given the failure of SEATO and the downgrading of the ANZUS alliance. It may seem even more naive to say that, as a democratic state with an advanced military and a powerful economy, Taiwan could add a lot to such an organization.
But it is no less naive than believing that another round of Six Party talks hosted by Beijing is going to resolve the North Korean crisis.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with