Few visitors who come to London without being able to speak English can have had such an effect on such a great variety of people as President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela has just had here.
In the course of the hectic 48 hours that his presidential Airbus was on the ground, the leader of one of the world's biggest oil producers threw himself into one public meeting after the other and fitted in interviews for newspapers, radio and television and consultations with political leaders and captains of industry.
The effect he had on his hearers was remarkable, despite the fact that most had to understand him through the simultaneous translation they received through the little hand-held wirelesses they were provided with at the different venues.
Chavez's excursions into English were limited to "Good afternoon" and "I love you" a couple of times. He started with a meeting in the workaday surrounding of Camden Town Hall in north London which Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, chaired for him on May14 with hundreds of politically committed people, many of them young and many of them Latin American.
He continued in the baroque grandeur of the Banqueting Hall in Whitehall near the Houses of Parliament the following day with the cream of British business with connections to the region. His long, forceful speeches were received with surprise and the enthusiasm.
When he took off on May16 for Algeria and Libya, the big producers of oil and gas in North Africa, those who had heard him had much to think about.
His stay to Britain, billed as private, came after a visit to Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican and to Vienna where the president of the EU was hosting one of the periodical summit meetings of Caribbean, European and Latin American heads of state.
This visit to London, unlike a previous one however, did not include a call on Queen Elizabeth II or British Prime Minister Tony Blair, though he conveyed his respectful greeting to them. It could hardly have been otherwise since earlier this year Blair had been scathing about the Venezuelan's friendship with Cuban President Fidel Castro when he replied to a question put to him in the House of Commons by one of the growing number of members of parliament who are Chavez's British supporters.
The messages Chavez delivered at Camden and Whitehall which lasted three-and-a-half hours and two hours respectively were unashamedly critical of neo-liberal ideas espoused by the government of the US and such bodies as the World Bank and the IMF.
He was particularly critical of US President George W. Bush, Blair's main ally, whom he accuses of backing the violent opposition in Venezuela and of supporting those in the US who want to finish with him and his government by any method, legal or illegal.
Though the two countries are mutually dependent on the flow of 1,500,000 barrels of crude oil which Venezuela supplies every day to the US, relations are strained, a point which was underlined by Washington as it announced a ban on the supply of US arms to Chavez while he was in London.
The Venezuelan leader went on to launch a defense of the sort of democratic socialism practiced in his country where, despite the success of a group of right wingers who overthrew him for 48 hours and proclaimed a dictatorship in 2002. In a series of clean election victories he has demonstrated his high levels of support among the majority who are sunk in poverty in an oil-rich country and who are just beginning to benefit from his massive new spending on social programs.
Chavez acknowledged the help he has received from Castro who has sent some 20,000 doctors and other medical staff to bring free health services throughout the country where none had existed before. Civil liberties and an aggressively free press have been maintained in Venezuela in contrast to the situation in the many dictatorships which over the years the US has supported in a region which was once known as "Washington's back yard."
His political message and his willingness to hold gatherings and meet the public at Camden endeared him to many young British people and many of the numerous ill-paid Latin American migrants in London.
It contrasted markedly with the somewhat lifeless political discourse in Britain and unwillingness of British political leaders to mingle with the electorate for fear of awkward questions or "for security considerations."
For British industrialists and bankers gathered in the gilded splendor of the Banqueting Hall in Whitehall, Chavez had further endearments. While he urged them not to be afraid of what he calls "20th century socialism" he went on to appeal to Britain, which had done so much to help Latin America to free itself of Spanish domination two centuries ago, to return with investment and know-how.
Reminding them that Venezuela's cash reserves came to more than US$30 billion and its oil reserves were the world's largest, he invited them into such projects as four new underground railway systems, a natural gas pipeline to link Venezuela with Argentina -- crossing the Amazon River and Brazil on the way -- and vast new petrochemical schemes.
Not for nothing did the businessmen and bankers stand up and cheer when the stocky man in the well-cut suit and the red tie finished his speech. He wants to come back this way.
"I want to go to Ireland very soon," he told me."
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS