I am writing in response to recent adverse comment on Taipei Zoo.
From my own knowledge this criticism is justified. And, although there are some mitigating factors, the situation is an appalling indictment of the zoo's management.
For a modern, well-funded zoo to keep an animal, namely a chimpanzee (`Siao Chiang'), in cramped, solitary confinement for nine years simply because he was intelligent enough to manage to escape on two occasions and also misbehaved, is inexcusable.
Although the zoo has used a lack of funds as justification, there has been sufficient funding available to construct an enormously expensive Panda House and adjoining buildings (which are now a white elephant as these animals are not coming to Taiwan), and a sea of concrete and garish buildings which, however appealing they are to visitors, appear to have been constructed at the expense of the animals.
There were funds enough to buy false trees to replace the natural ones cut down. I could go on ad infinitum, however, I will just say that the current orangutans on exhibit, which are totally arboreal in nature, are housed in an enclosure more suitable for the African rock hyrax.
However, there are two sides to every coin. In respect of the pandas, where politics raises its ugly head, the chimps I saw shivering in the recent winter cold are, despite having a DNA and molecular structure similar to humans, not the economic draw pandas are and all zoos are subject to the exhibit value of their animals.
Also, the zoo authorities are not masters of their own fate -- they are controlled by the Taipei City Council, which appears to be reluctant to loosen its purse strings, at least where the animals' welfare is concerned. On a recent visit to the zoo, together with an associate, the zoo staff promised to carry out he improvements we suggested, and credit must be given to them because they are trying their best although their hands are tied, at least for now, where budgetary matters are concerned.
As a longtime resident of Taiwan, I am most concerned with the nation's image abroad, and I feel the Taiwan's interests would be better served by a committee to oversee all aspects of the zoo.
Local academics in relevant fields and representatives of international wildlife agencies could act as observers and advisors, without political interference.
The criterion governing every decision should be a balanced concern for both visitors to the zoo and its animal inhabitants. A member of this committee could act as a zoo press officer to ensure that Taipei Zoo gets fair media coverage both locally and overseas.
The zoo is an enormous success financially, with a huge budget, millions of visitors and all the necessary expertise. It should, and can, be able to avoid criticism.
Charles Shuttleworth
Representative in Taiwan, International Primate
Protection League
Taipei County
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
RSS