On May 20 last year the first anniversary of President Chen Shui-bian's (
The new initiative means Chinese travelers will hereafter be divided into four major groups, depending on their destination. First, those going to "other" countries, who are covered by the 2002 "Measures for the Administration of the Overseas Tours of Chinese Citizens" (
The second group, covered by the "Notice of the State Administration of Tourism on the Relevant Issues concerning the Travel Agencies' Organizing Inland Residents to Travel to Hong Kong and Macao" (
Thirdly, there are those travelers going to neighboring countries, covered by the "Interim Measures for the Administration of Tours of Neighboring Countries" (
And the fourth and final group, most recently mandated, is Chinese travelers going to Taiwan.
Taiwan has already become a destination among Chinese tourists. The Taiwanese government claims that China has to first include Taiwan in its list of travel destinations before both sides of the Taiwan strait can conduct further negotiations. However, Beijing has yet to respond to Taiwan in this regard.
This raises problems as, on the one hand, a destination isn't generally included on the list before negotiations are completed, and on the other, according to the "Measures for the Administration of the Overseas Tours of Chinese Citizens," taking a trip to Taiwan is not actually considered an overseas tour.
Article 17 of "Measures for the Control of Chinese Citizens Traveling to or from the Region of Taiwan," which deals with how organized tour groups operate, such as the appropriate way to deal with illegal stays by Chinese tourists, is very similar to the contents of the "Measures for the Administration of the Overseas Tours of Chinese Citizens."
What makes the "Measures for the Control of Chinese Citizens Traveling to or from the Region of Taiwan" different is Article 4, which stipulates that Taiwanese travel agencies receiving Chinese tourists must be approved by China's NTA -- this approval is subsequently announced by the Cross-Strait Tourism Association (
Article 4 has two implications. First, China does not actively direct overseas travel agencies that receive Chinese tourists but will have tight control of Taiwanese travel agencies doing so. Second, the Cross-Strait Tourism Association, which China's National Tourism Administration Director Shao Qiwei (
As Shao first said, this organization will in future play a significant role in cross-strait negotiations. Taiwan's government will probably also have to establish a new government agency to act as a counterpart of this association instead of the "Travel Agent Association" (全聯會) it had originally appointed.
However, I have my doubts as to whether or not this means that Chinese tourists will be able to travel to Taiwan immediately.
First, it remains to be seen if cross-strait tourism negotiations will be based on the so-called "1992 consensus." Will Beijing find it acceptable if Taipei continues to deny the existence of this consensus?
Second, will China be willing to see Chen Shui-bian's government make a comeback on the economic front during the final two years of his presidency, or will they mix talks and procrastination to let the pan-blue camp reap the benefits? After all, it took three years for Beijing and Tokyo to ink a deal on tourism-related issues.
Third, it remains to be seen whether or not China will allow Taiwan to set up an "overseas agency" issuing visas in China. This involves the sovereignty issue, and it is not very efficient to have applications reviewed in Hong Kong or Macau. It would also be difficult to verify credentials and qualifications -- both the EU and Japan now interview applicants before issuing a visa to prevent illegal stays.
Fourth, if cross-strait direct flights are not established forcing visitors to travel via Hong Kong or Macao, the price of traveling to Taiwan is not going to be competitive, which would mitigate the effects of deregulation.
Kinmen can be included as an entry and exit point. It could serve as a buffer, and such an arrangement could offer a boost to tourism in Kinmen while also reducing the negative impact of the high speed rail on domestic civil aviation once it starts its services.
Judging from the opening of the three small direct links in 2000 and the opening up of category 2 and category 3 Chinese tourism in 2002, the impact of a unilateral opening of Taiwan to Chinese tourism without any prior negotiations would probably be quite insignificant.
Fan Shih-ping is an assistant professor in the Department of International Affairs at National Kinmen Institute of Technology.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers