Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Because he no longer represents the KMT at large, China has surreptitiously changed the name of the event from the "KMT-CCP Economic and Trade Forum" to the "Cross-strait Economic and Trade Forum." In this case, Lien, of course, has even less right to represent all of Taiwan.
While chanting statistical figures at the forum, Lien also disseminated misinformation to confuse the public's perception of the cross-strait relationship.
First, Lien said: "Don't demonize or smear China." But China continues to be an inhumane one-party political dictatorship. Could it possibly be that China is a beacon of democracy, and not a state whose communist nature is treated with contempt by the world? Could it possibly be that it is an angel of peace with its ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan? The answer is no on both counts.
Second, Lien said: "We gather here today to set out with a pragmatic attitude, without any political ideology." But Jia Qinglin (賈慶林), chairman of China's People's Political Consultative Conference, chastised Taiwan's decision to mothball the National Unification Council (NUC) in a speech immediately following Lien's statements. Wasn't Jia's reaction politically and ideologically driven? After all, the demon had showed itself, nullifying Lien's description of China as an angel.
Third, while Lien praised China's rise as a "great trend," I thought that he, being a follower of KMT founder Sun Yat-sen (孫中山), would cite Sun's saying that "democracy is a global trend." To my surprise, he said that dictatorial China's rise is an inescapable fact, and when Hu cited Sun during his meeting with Lien, he conveniently omitted the part about democracy being a global trend.
Fourth, another of Lien's great theories concerns regional economic cooperation. With China being the central spotlight in the Asian region, he asked where Taiwan can go, and raised the prospect that the country will become marginalized. But that begs the question of whether this is the fault of Taiwan itself. KMT Legislator Chu Feng-chi (
Fifth, Lien only cited Taiwan's trade deficit with China and emphasized Taiwan's dependency on China. But he failed to point out Taiwan's huge investments in China, nor did he highlight the great contributions of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople to China's economic development, or mention the political blackmail of Taiwanese businesspeople that has become routine in China today.
Sixth, Lien talked about the plan to develop Taiwan into an "Asia-Pacific regional operations center." In fact, this used to be one of Lien's unrealistic day dreams from back when he was premier. Just think, given that Hong Kong, located next to China, has gradually had its status as an Asia-Pacific regional operations center taken over by Shanghai and Shenzhen, how could the harbor of Kaohsiung with its limited hinterland compete with these cities to become a regional operations center?
The CCP never makes any concessions on political issues. The fact that "one China, with each side having its own interpretation" has come to naught further reveals China's ambition to ultimately annex Taiwan. Still, Lien had to hurry off to Beijing to give Hu a political make-up job prior to his visit to the US.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS