Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Washington's long-term effort to build up a "candid, constructive and cooperative" relationship with Beijing constitutes a broader agenda in terms of engaging China in the international system. The aim is to incrementally transform China into a politically democratic and economically liberal country, while at the same time letting its leaders shoulder the responsibility of being a great power. The current Bush team has developed a strategy of "co-engagement" with China.
Despite uncertainties within Chinese society, there is a greater need for China to understand its own responsibility as an emerging power. China's future role not only affects the establishment of a new international order politically, it also relates to the formation of a peaceful and secure post-Cold War era in the Asia-Pacific region. Furthermore, the liberalization and internationalization of China's economy will have a decisive effect on the process of globalization.
International observers argue that the danger of conflict increases particularly when the challenger is an undemocratic state. Democracies are generally satisfied powers, unlikely to challenge the status quo. An undemocratic challenger, however, is more threatening to the world order, and hence more likely to induce a more belligerent response from a democratic leader and its allies.
Given that Beijing is already expanding its own political, military and economic influence, it is worth asking whether or not China understands all the responsibilities of being a "great power." More significantly, does China have the capability to shoulder this responsibility?
The biggest irony lies in China's unwillingness to renounce the use of force against Taiwan. Hu has not indicated that he is ready to begin talks with Taiwan's elected leader -- President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). Regarding Taiwan, the Chinese leadership has offered nothing new, instead demanding its unilateral acceptance of the "one China" principle as a condition for resuming cross-strait talks.
Beijing must understand that the status of a "great power" is not illustrated by active expansion of military capabilities or in military threats against smaller countries. As a great power, China must understand its responsibilities from the perspective of acting as a leader in the region. Suppressing Taiwan's international space and creating tension across the Taiwan Strait are not constructive in this regard. Unilaterally requesting that the Taiwanese accept ultimate "unification" with China also violates freedom of choice.
Therefore, instead of wildly guessing whether Bush will verbally condemn recent moves by Taiwan's leader to provoke Beijing when he meets Hu, the public and the local media should take into account the larger political picture of how China should bear responsibility internationally as a rising power. Moreover, discussion should also focus on how a democratic Taiwan can help shape China's belligerent and undemocratic mentality.
Only by distinguishing Taiwan's democracy and peace-loving free will from China's military-oriented authoritarian rule will the global community fully understand the need to breed a politically democratic and economically liberal China.
Liu Kuan-teh is Taipei-based political commentator.
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
RSS