Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
With China's US trade surplus reaching US$200 billion last year, US sentiment is leaning toward taking strong measures. A recent congressional bill has called for imposing a 27.5 percent punitive tariff on Chinese imports.
The trade imbalance is more complicated than the currency issue per se. Globalization has strengthened the ability of capital to flow to wherever investment promises the highest return; likewise, competitive manufactured products from low-wage economies will flow in the other direction. That is why China fascinates US investors, among others, and why US customers buy Chinese products.
To be sure, the exchange rate has an impact on investment and trade. But, even with China's efforts to loosen the yuan-dollar linkage, it is arguable whether revaluation could save US jobs or improve the US trade balance. After all, China is not alone: India and other competitive developing countries pose a similar challenge to the US.
Nevertheless, for China's part, it now seems to be a good time to reflect on how to increase the country's value-added exports, as well as focus on environmental protection and sustainability. Thus, there is scope for a compromise that recognizes both sides' legitimate concerns.
The Chinese government is hastening its shopping spree in the US these days, pushing up the yuan's exchange rate slowly but steadily. A sensible US policy on China would be to accept gradual currency appreciation, rather than a large revaluation, as the US' economic vitality stems from its own innovation rather than from concessions by the Chinese government.
A more difficult issue for Hu could be IPR. China's recent campaign to crack down on pirating needs to be encouraged, but far more needs to be done. However, while the US government and US companies question whether the Chinese are willing and able to enforce such rights, this issue must be put in historical perspective.
IPR protection is related to economic development, so the question should be whether China has reached the stage at which effective protection is possible.
There is a positive side to such problems, however, namely that their very emergence reflects the deepening and broadening of bilateral relations. Indeed, Sino-US interaction has been so strong that the two presidents met five times last year.
For example, the two states share a common interest in anti-terrorism efforts, and they have been collaborating to ensure container security and combat human trafficking. Their coordinated efforts to divert North Korea peacefully from its nuclear course have also vindicated bilateral cooperation when both sides can define a common security stake.
Similarly, the two countries have a common interest in stabilizing China's relations with Taiwan. The current formula, maintaining the "status quo," offers the highest common denominator. With this strategic understanding, there is good reason to expect that Hu's talks with Bush on Taiwan's recent termination of the National Unification Council will serve to reduce tensions. China and the US both have much to gain by thwarting Taiwan's apparent moves toward independence.
Nevertheless, to US eyes, other contentious issues are now emerging in relations with China. The recently released National Security Strategy outlines three, in particular: China's global trade expansion, its military transparency and its relations with "misruling" states.
The political cost of a serious compromise on these matters would be high for China, but it does no harm to analyze and discuss them. Among the issues, military transparency seems to be the most sensitive and difficult to address.
Nevertheless, given the large size of China's armed forces, which currently stand at 2.3 million, a rough calculation would indicate that average monthly spending per soldier is at most 2,500 yuan (US$312). But if China wants to raise the military budget to improve the quality of its army, the demands of fiscal stability could make military transparency important for domestic reasons, and China might no longer view it as being off limits in its relations with the US.
Above all, we must bear in mind the maturation of Sino-US relations in recent years. A mature bilateral relationship is one in which even difficult issues can be discussed routinely. There is no question that such a framework has already been established in relations with the US. We will now see how Hu uses that framework -- and thus what imprint he leaves on the bilateral relationship -- in meeting the current challenges.
Shen Dingli is executive dean of the Institute of International Studies and deputy director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
RSS