Admiring the rural beauty of Taiwan, an elderly Japanese couple surnamed Nakamura arrived in Puli (埔里) in Nantou County early this month under the pilot "long-stay" program initiated by the Tourism Bureau. After only a couple of weeks, however, the two put an end to what they called a "torturous stay," complaining not only about the lack of facilities such as dehumidifiers, a clothes dryer and a plate dryer at their rented house, but also about the numerous motorcycles, pollution and noise, as well as the dog feces-strewn streets.
Nakamura rebuked the township administration of Puli and the government as represented by officials of the Tourism Bureau. Certainly, he was scolding all Taiwanese.
Most Taiwanese see Puli as the "pride of Taiwan." But as the Japanese couple see it, the living conditions in Puli are abominable and these have detracted from Puli's natural attractions. This is an insult to Puli, but also to the nation as a whole, since Taipei, the capital city of Taiwan, is also a filthy and chaotic city. Small wonder that Der Spiegel, a German newspaper, once told the world that "The Taiwanese people simply live in a pigsty."
Any Taiwanese who has traveled to Europe, Japan, New Zealand or Singapore should be aware that Taiwan's environmental quality is the reflection of a very backward society. We should all ask ourselves if the Japanese couple really are wrong.
Is it wrong to demand decent living conditions and human dignity? Is it wrong to demand that the threats of cancer and other diseases be minimized by creating an environment free of air pollution and restricting scooter traffic in urban areas, that dog droppings are cleaned up by the owners, or that trash problems are eliminated by giving heavy fines to people who litter?
The protests lodged by Puli residents against the Nakamuras are a reflection of a culture of below-par values and sanitation standards. These unacceptable cultural standards are not unique to Puli, but extend across the nation. Government officials, particularly those in the environmental protection and health agencies -- and everyone else in the country, including the premier and the president -- seem to be indifferent to these various kinds of environmental pollution.
If Singapore can do it, then why can't Taiwan follow suit? Some believe the pervasive filth is a cultural issue, when it in fact is a systemic issue relating to the inertia of bureaucrats and the enforcement of the law. There are many weaknesses in human nature, but differences in behavior stem from differences in systems and regulations. If people obey regulations, they will come to cherish a neat and tidy living space in the long run.
If, however, people do not obey these regulations and if law-enforcement officials do nothing to deter and punish such behavior, air pollution, dog droppings and garbage will continue to be part of our daily lives, and the result will be a culture that doesn't cherish neat and tidy living conditions.
Therefore, we should condemn neither the residents of Puli nor the Japanese couple. Rather it is the township chief of Puli, the Nantou County Government's Environmental Bureau, police force and county commissioner, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Health and the premier that should be blamed.
They have never found ways to strictly enforce the law nor have they thought of strategies to ameliorate the situation. As a result, the illegal destruction of the environment and worsening sanitation infrastructure are spreading, turning our beautiful island into a pigsty, and turning Puli, the pride of Taiwan, into a place unfit to live.
Tsai Chi-yuan is an associate research fellow at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands