The US Pacific Command is recasting the posture of its military forces in the western Pacific and Asia with the new pivot point to be a robust base on the island of Guam. The operative watchword has already become "flexibility."
"Look at a map," said the command's leader, Admiral William Fallon, as he flew toward Guam after a week-long trek through Southeast Asia.
He pointed to the relatively short distances from Guam to South Korea, the Taiwan Strait across which China and Taiwan confront one another, and Southeast Asia, the frontier of terror in Asia.
US officers often talk about the "tyranny of distance" in the Pacific Command's area of operations, which runs from the west coast of North America to the east coast of Africa. Guam, when it is fully operational, will provide a base for land, naval and air forces that is closer to targets than to forces on the US mainland or Hawaii. Guam was a major air base during the war in Vietnam.
A genuine advantage, Fallon said, was that "Guam is American territory."
The island does not have the political restrictions, such as those in South Korea, that could impede US military moves in an emergency. South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun, who has repeatedly taken an anti-American stance, has suggested that US forces could not be deployed from South Korea without his government's approval.
In an interview on his airplane and in congressional testimony last week, the admiral emphasized the vital role that Japan would continue to play in US strategy.
"The US-Japan alliance remains the most important pact in the Pacific," he said.
Even so, depending on what sort of government is in power in Tokyo, there could be political complications in deploying forces elsewhere from Japan.
The disadvantage to Guam is the rundown state of the island's infrastructure, meaning roads, the electrical system, the water supply, piers and airfield runways.
"I want that infrastructure fixed," Fallon said.
One runway at Andersen Air Force Base has already been torn up prior to rebuilding it. Guam is vulnerable to typhoons and should have its power lines buried, Fallon said.
Fallon said he saw the island as primarily a staging area through which troops, ships, and planes would surge toward contingencies in Asia. The island's maintenance and repair capacity would be refurbished and expanded so that aircraft carriers, for instance, could be serviced without having to return to home ports on the West Coast.
What all this will cost and whether Congress will provide sufficient funds has yet to be determined.
About 7,000 Marines, including the headquarters of the III Marine Expeditionary Force, would go to Guam from Okinawa, where friction between Marines and Okinawans has been constant. Three fast-attack submarines are based at Guam now and two more will be assigned there. Squadrons of B-1 bombers are rotated through Guam from the US for several months at a time.
On realigning US forces in Japan, US and Japanese officials have been putting the finishing touches on an agreement due to be completed by the end of this month. It was to include a new US army headquarters alongside a Japanese Ground Defense Force headquarters at Camp Zama, southwest of Tokyo, and a similar arrangement for air force units at Yokota Air Base, west of Tokyo.
Japan has already agreed that the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier George Washington will replace the Kitty Hawk, driven by conventional steam turbines, in Yokosuka in 2008. Kitty Hawk is to be retired because of its age.
Throughout the discussion of his vision for positioning forces in the Asia-Pacific region, Fallon emphasized "flexibility."
"We need to have forces ready to react," he said. "We must have built-in flexibility" to meet emergencies, including disaster relief and other humanitarian operations.
He underscored that when he flew by helicopter from Clark Field north of Manila in the Philippines to the amphibious assault ship Essex at sea to thank the Marines and sailors aboard for their efforts in trying to rescue victims of the giant mudslide on the island of Leyte.
"You responded magnificently with great speed, agility, demonstrating flexibility in shifting your priority focus," he told sailors and Marines assembled on the flight deck.
They had started an exercise in the Philippines before taking on the relief work.
In congressional testimony, Fallon expanded on that theme: "Forward-deployed forces, ready for immediate employment, send an unambiguous signal of undiminished US commitment to the Asia-Pacific area. Agile and responsive global forces also act to deter aggression."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun