The US Pacific Command is recasting the posture of its military forces in the western Pacific and Asia with the new pivot point to be a robust base on the island of Guam. The operative watchword has already become "flexibility."
"Look at a map," said the command's leader, Admiral William Fallon, as he flew toward Guam after a week-long trek through Southeast Asia.
He pointed to the relatively short distances from Guam to South Korea, the Taiwan Strait across which China and Taiwan confront one another, and Southeast Asia, the frontier of terror in Asia.
US officers often talk about the "tyranny of distance" in the Pacific Command's area of operations, which runs from the west coast of North America to the east coast of Africa. Guam, when it is fully operational, will provide a base for land, naval and air forces that is closer to targets than to forces on the US mainland or Hawaii. Guam was a major air base during the war in Vietnam.
A genuine advantage, Fallon said, was that "Guam is American territory."
The island does not have the political restrictions, such as those in South Korea, that could impede US military moves in an emergency. South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun, who has repeatedly taken an anti-American stance, has suggested that US forces could not be deployed from South Korea without his government's approval.
In an interview on his airplane and in congressional testimony last week, the admiral emphasized the vital role that Japan would continue to play in US strategy.
"The US-Japan alliance remains the most important pact in the Pacific," he said.
Even so, depending on what sort of government is in power in Tokyo, there could be political complications in deploying forces elsewhere from Japan.
The disadvantage to Guam is the rundown state of the island's infrastructure, meaning roads, the electrical system, the water supply, piers and airfield runways.
"I want that infrastructure fixed," Fallon said.
One runway at Andersen Air Force Base has already been torn up prior to rebuilding it. Guam is vulnerable to typhoons and should have its power lines buried, Fallon said.
Fallon said he saw the island as primarily a staging area through which troops, ships, and planes would surge toward contingencies in Asia. The island's maintenance and repair capacity would be refurbished and expanded so that aircraft carriers, for instance, could be serviced without having to return to home ports on the West Coast.
What all this will cost and whether Congress will provide sufficient funds has yet to be determined.
About 7,000 Marines, including the headquarters of the III Marine Expeditionary Force, would go to Guam from Okinawa, where friction between Marines and Okinawans has been constant. Three fast-attack submarines are based at Guam now and two more will be assigned there. Squadrons of B-1 bombers are rotated through Guam from the US for several months at a time.
On realigning US forces in Japan, US and Japanese officials have been putting the finishing touches on an agreement due to be completed by the end of this month. It was to include a new US army headquarters alongside a Japanese Ground Defense Force headquarters at Camp Zama, southwest of Tokyo, and a similar arrangement for air force units at Yokota Air Base, west of Tokyo.
Japan has already agreed that the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier George Washington will replace the Kitty Hawk, driven by conventional steam turbines, in Yokosuka in 2008. Kitty Hawk is to be retired because of its age.
Throughout the discussion of his vision for positioning forces in the Asia-Pacific region, Fallon emphasized "flexibility."
"We need to have forces ready to react," he said. "We must have built-in flexibility" to meet emergencies, including disaster relief and other humanitarian operations.
He underscored that when he flew by helicopter from Clark Field north of Manila in the Philippines to the amphibious assault ship Essex at sea to thank the Marines and sailors aboard for their efforts in trying to rescue victims of the giant mudslide on the island of Leyte.
"You responded magnificently with great speed, agility, demonstrating flexibility in shifting your priority focus," he told sailors and Marines assembled on the flight deck.
They had started an exercise in the Philippines before taking on the relief work.
In congressional testimony, Fallon expanded on that theme: "Forward-deployed forces, ready for immediate employment, send an unambiguous signal of undiminished US commitment to the Asia-Pacific area. Agile and responsive global forces also act to deter aggression."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify