Regarding the letter by Chaim Melamed (Letters, Jan. 19, page 8), I would like to solemnly clarify the allegations that foreign workers' human rights lack government protection, that they are paid low salaries, that they have to pay unreasonable broker's fees, and the severe and incorrect interpretation of the policies and regulations currently executed by the government.
The Council of Labor Affairs has abided by the principle of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 7, that all people are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection by the law. The council ensures that foreign workers are entitled to the same protection as Taiwanese workers by adopting the concepts of equal treatment and human rights that the nation was founded on.
According to the Labor Standards Law (
The letter published in the Taipei Times stated that the monthly salaries received by foreign workers are less than half the amount received by local workers, and implied that foreign workers are being exploited.
Salaries are agreed upon by both the employer and the worker under legitimate circumstances, as both parties hold sufficient autonomy to decide whether or not to recognize the labor contract. Therefore, it would be inappropriate for the government to exert excessive interference in the employer-worker relationship, for this violates the principles of both free labor and international labor employment markets.
Taiwan provides workers with the protection of minimum wages for the purpose of covering their basic living expenses, not to adopt the same salary standard for all workers across the board.
Furthermore, to address the issue of whether the broker's fees paid by foreign workers are reasonable, since the need for brokerage services originated in the employment services market, the Council of Labor Affairs is obligated to manage and determine the standard charges levied by brokerage services.
If such charges were manipulated solely by the brokerage operators, it would obviously have disadvantageous consequences because of the disproportional amount of information held by the employers and workers.
To safeguard the public interest, the government should therefore actively exercise power by effectively managing the workers and employers that use brokerage services.
In regard to Melamed's allegation that foreign workers are being exploited, the Council of Labor Affairs stresses that brokers' fees should be set at a reasonable level in accordance with the regulations.
If the government were to waive the right to promulgate laws and regulations to avoid complicated and controversial labor issues, it would have an adverse effect on the rights and benefits of workers, and subsequently prompt objections from the international community.
The letter also mentioned the lack of protection for those who were immediately repatriated for their involvement in the Kaohsiung MRT labor riot, and that their letters of grievance went unprocessed by the authorities.
Although the law protects the interests of foreign workers, they are bound to abide by the laws and regulations of the Labor Standards Law just like local workers. Any illegal acts are subject to trial in a court of law, which corresponds with the principles of governing a country.
Upon receiving any appeal or report of illegal acts by any member of the public, the authorities are bound by duty to investigate the facts of the case, collect evidence and determine the processing procedures according to law. It is also the duty of the authorities not to pursue cases based on groundless suspicions, since this would clearly jeopardize the rights and benefits that foreign workers are entitled to.
The Council of Labor Affairs welcomes any evidence of illegal or inappropriate behavior from a member of the public against any official authority, and their claims will be prosecuted in accordance with the law.
Safeguarding the rights and benefits of foreign workers has consistently been the general policy adopted by the Council of Labor Affairs.
Improving the working environment and augmenting the rights and benefits of foreign workers have been Council of Labor Affairs Minister Lee Ying-yuan's (
In the future, the Council of Labor Affairs will consider the direction of policymaking on human rights preservation by using measures adopted by international labor or immigrant organizations as a reference for protecting the human rights of foreign workers in Taiwan and in making future plans to safeguard their rights and benefits.
Tsai Meng-liang
Director, Foreign Workers Affairs, Bureau of Employment and Vocational Training, Council of Labor Affairs
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS