Since the 2004 presidential election and the election-eve assassination attempt on the head of state, the phrase "two bullets" has sparked furious and partisan debate, and for those in the pan-blue camp, it has become synonymous with fabrication and deception.
Unwilling to accept the results of the presidential election, the pan-blues have since refused to place their trust in President Chen Shui-bian (
Is there any evidence to indicate that Chen orchestrated the assassination bid himself? As yet, there is not.
However, this has not prevented politicians and the media from forming their own theories about the incident and airing them repeatedly in public in an attempt to give credence to them.
As a result, this issue can no longer be dealt with in a reasonable manner.
The most damaging argument against Chen's version of events is that if the "two bullets" had never existed, the pan-blue camp would most likely have been returned to power.
However, this reasoning alone does not constitute hard evidence.
The sensation surrounding the "two bullets" incident has resulted in our national leader, government officials, legislators as well as most of the media jumping aboard the "scandal" bandwagon.
They have found it is easier to strike a chord with the public by accusing whoever they like of whatever they like, without providing any substantial corroborating evidence.
Recently, Kaohsiung County Commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興) accused Deputy Minister of Education Fan Sun-lu (范巽綠) of improperly intervening in the construction of a building at Kaohsiung's Fengshan Junior High School.
Afterward, the media continued to pursue the issue by providing irrelevant "evidence" and insinuating that Fan was actually the one "calling the shots" in the ministry.
The incident in which independent Legislator Chiu Yi (
What's more, Chiu's "evidence" could not even establish that Ma was involved in wrongdoing in the first place, let alone that any insider trading had occurred.
As a lawmaker, Chiu could have asked government officials to put the assets in question into trust or called for a public declaration whenever a transaction was made. Either move would surely have won public support.
Clearly, Chiu was not interested in dealing with the facts of the matter or establishing what actually happened -- he was only interested in encouraging the public to imagine the worst.
Having been a participant in the instability that followed the "two bullets" scandal, Chiu knows that the more equivocal the accusation, the more likely the public will believe that it is well-founded.
While there is no smoke without fire, those being accused are not necessarily in the wrong.
And sometimes, we need to take a closer look at the accusers themselves.
The recent flood of accusations has muddled right and wrong and made it impossible to disentangle reasoned debate from sensationalism.
The slander ruling on the "soft coup" case is not enough to turn back this tide. It is more than likely that there will be further such "scandals" in future.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS