Since the 2004 presidential election and the election-eve assassination attempt on the head of state, the phrase "two bullets" has sparked furious and partisan debate, and for those in the pan-blue camp, it has become synonymous with fabrication and deception.
Unwilling to accept the results of the presidential election, the pan-blues have since refused to place their trust in President Chen Shui-bian (
Is there any evidence to indicate that Chen orchestrated the assassination bid himself? As yet, there is not.
However, this has not prevented politicians and the media from forming their own theories about the incident and airing them repeatedly in public in an attempt to give credence to them.
As a result, this issue can no longer be dealt with in a reasonable manner.
The most damaging argument against Chen's version of events is that if the "two bullets" had never existed, the pan-blue camp would most likely have been returned to power.
However, this reasoning alone does not constitute hard evidence.
The sensation surrounding the "two bullets" incident has resulted in our national leader, government officials, legislators as well as most of the media jumping aboard the "scandal" bandwagon.
They have found it is easier to strike a chord with the public by accusing whoever they like of whatever they like, without providing any substantial corroborating evidence.
Recently, Kaohsiung County Commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興) accused Deputy Minister of Education Fan Sun-lu (范巽綠) of improperly intervening in the construction of a building at Kaohsiung's Fengshan Junior High School.
Afterward, the media continued to pursue the issue by providing irrelevant "evidence" and insinuating that Fan was actually the one "calling the shots" in the ministry.
The incident in which independent Legislator Chiu Yi (
What's more, Chiu's "evidence" could not even establish that Ma was involved in wrongdoing in the first place, let alone that any insider trading had occurred.
As a lawmaker, Chiu could have asked government officials to put the assets in question into trust or called for a public declaration whenever a transaction was made. Either move would surely have won public support.
Clearly, Chiu was not interested in dealing with the facts of the matter or establishing what actually happened -- he was only interested in encouraging the public to imagine the worst.
Having been a participant in the instability that followed the "two bullets" scandal, Chiu knows that the more equivocal the accusation, the more likely the public will believe that it is well-founded.
While there is no smoke without fire, those being accused are not necessarily in the wrong.
And sometimes, we need to take a closer look at the accusers themselves.
The recent flood of accusations has muddled right and wrong and made it impossible to disentangle reasoned debate from sensationalism.
The slander ruling on the "soft coup" case is not enough to turn back this tide. It is more than likely that there will be further such "scandals" in future.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS