Now that the local government elections are over, it is time to turn our attention to the cross-strait trade situation.
If the soon to be convened Economic Development Advisory Conference decides to further relax government policy on cross-strait trade, this is likely to lead to a massive outflow of money from Taiwan and increase the risk of Beijing using commercial means to force Taiwan into accepting "one country, two systems."
In the US, people have been calling for a reassessment of the trade relationship with China as Beijing's unconventional trade practices have hurt the US economy. This year, the US's trade deficit with China will reach a record high of US$200 billion.
The respected business consultant Ethan Gutmann in his book Losing the New China has a number of important observations which are helpful responses to these problems.
Gutmann worked in China for many years and was involved in television production, and also served as a business consultant. He rapidly made his way into the expatriate community of US entrepreneurs in China and was even deputy chairman of the government liaison committee of the American Chamber of Commerce. As a result, he obtained a deep insight into the operation of foreign businesses in China and the corruption within the country. This information is known to many China experts and businesspeople, but they remain silent to avoid offending their hosts. Gutmann is unusual in that he has had the courage to write a truthful account, and his four conclusions are worth repeating:
First, most US companies in China have not made money. Gutmann says that under a third would be able to show quarterly profits, and if you factor in their initial investment, perhaps only 5 percent have really turned a profit.
Second, Gutmann says the China market is a black hole into which money sinks without trace. This is because it is not a normal society, but rather a place where lying officials, a rigid and harsh bureaucracy and rampant piracy rule.
Third, Gutmann said that if foreign companies want to succeed in China, they must adopt one of three measures. One is to be led by the Chinese Communist Party, in the manner of Laurence Brahm, who owes his success to toeing the party line in innumerable articles that read as though they were from the People's Daily. Another is through bribery of high officials and the third is flattery. An example of this is the behavior of Cisco Systems, who provided China with firewall technologies to control the Internet, even going so far as to sell this technology at half the price. Another example is Yahoo, whose search engine in China will reject terms such as "Taiwan independence," and "Falun Gong."
Fourth, Gutmann claims that many US companies in China falsify their accounts to their parent companies to show a profit. They organize vanity trips in which US executives can hobnob with high-level Chinese officials.
Gutmann describes the debauchery that is commonplace among the foreign business community, including sexual orgies and drug taking. He says that China offers three sources of attraction: economic, cultural and sexual, suggesting that local woman fall over themselves to fulfill the sexual demands of well-heeled foreign executives. In today's China, where sexual liberation has joined hands with economic reform, most young people have thrown themselves into the reform movement. Unfortunately, this reformist zeal mostly takes place below the waist.
Gutmann's book is clearly something that Taiwanese policy makers and businesspeople can read with profit.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS