"Boy, you really butchered those Waltzing Matilda lyrics," exclaims a cheerful member of the Gotcha! Gang, Australian division.
The version of A.B. (Banjo) Paterson's dialect lyric I recently quoted went "Once a jolly swagman camped by a billabong/Under the shade of a codibah tree,/And he sang as he sat and he waited for his billy-boil/Who'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me?"
Other versions exist. It's a coolibah tree, a type of fragrant eucalyptus that grows beside a billabong, which is not a water hole but a section of still water adjacent to a river, sometimes called an "oxbow lake" in the US.
And "there is no such thing as a billy-boil," which I defined as a "teapot," tartly observes another correspondent from Down Under. "A billy is a tin can used to boil water to make tea, more a kettle than a teapot."
As for swagman, one meaning in American English -- a carrier of loot -- is different in Australian English, defined as "an itinerant worker who carries his belongings, or swag, in a bedroll or knapsack."
And who was the famous Matilda?
"A matilda is a swag," notes Henry Ansgar Kelly of University of California, Los Angeles, "and one `waltzes' it by carrying it in front, not over the shoulder." (I pass this interesting thought along -- without verification -- while I soak my head, as some Aussie readers have suggested, in a billabong.)
WENT WITH THE WIND
Patrick Fitzgerald, the prosecutor on the CIA leak investigation, on announcing the indictment of the vice-presidential aide Scooter Libby, came up with this convolution in a press conference: "I would have wished nothing better, that, when the subpoenas were issued in August 2004, witnesses testified then ... No one would have went to jail."
"Really, is this the way an educated attorney speaks?" asks Eve Suffin, of Holden, Massachusetts.
Fitzgerald's clear abuse of the subjunctive would invites a charge of "aggravated solecism." He confused the past tense of the irregular verb to go -- that is, went -- with the past participle, gone. The subjunctive mood with its iffy "would have" takes the past participle of the verb, not the simple past; therefore, "would have gone" is correct and "would have went" is mistaken.
GRODY TO THE MAX
In a column about ickiness, I wrote that yuck "has resisted replacement by gross and its derivative grody." Derivative wrong.
Kate Styrsky of Berkeley, California, recalls "a scene in the Beatles' Hard Day's Night in which a smug designer shows a preposterously overstyled shirt to George Harrison, who comments, Liverpudlianishly, `Grotty.' When asked his meaning, he explains, `Grotesque."'
BLATANT VS. FLAGRANT
In an exegesis of raunch, I came out bluenosedly against "blatant sexual arousal."
"What, you, too?" This from Richard Hirschhorn in Jerusalem. "Confusing blatant and flagrant?"
Blatant means "noisily offensive," and has in it a strong element of "brazen, contemptuously unconcealed."
Flagrant, rooted in "flaming," is more outrageous, possibly flouting morality and law, as in the Latin in flagrante delicto, "during the blaze of the crime."
I didn't think about it at the time, but on review from the booth, I'll stick with "blatant sexual arousal" -- much heavy breathing and raunchy noise but no crime.
SURE
While looking up murder board for a recent column about preparation for Senate testimony, I happily noted a citation in the Oxford English Dictionary from a column of mine in 1976: "W. Safire: `Program murder boards' have been established to insure [sic] that the concept is structured properly." That lexicographer's severe [sic] wiped the smirk off my face.
In British usage, assure applies to giving confidence to a person, ensure generally "to make certain" and insure specifically "to guard against financial risk."
In American English, ensure and insure have merged and are now interchangeable.
You know what? The Brits have a useful distinction; that [sic] should stick. Everybody back up on the ramparts.
ON LINCOLN
Shouldn't a rhetorical question end with a question mark?
In Abraham Lincoln's "Second Inaugural Address" ("with malice toward none"), the Civil War president posed this complex, provocative religious question: "If we shall suppose that American Slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South, this terrible war, as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a Living God always ascribe to Him?"
In the Collected Works, as well as in the manuscript in Lincoln's handwriting at the Library of Congress, the question mark appears.
But on the marble wall of the Lincoln Memorial, the sentence ends with a period.
George Van Cleve, a lawyer in Arlington, Virginia, has been petitioning the National Park Service to change it to the way Lincoln wrote it. He has been getting the bureaucratic runaround.
Other mistakes can't compare. Restore Lincoln's question mark.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS