The resounding defeat of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in last week's local government elections should not have come as a surprise. This is just the manifestation of overwhelming public disappointment with the current state of the party.
While some of the credit for the election results must go to the rise of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the new hope that his leadership has instilled in pan-blue supporters, the Kaohsiung MRT scandal also had an impact. However most of the responsibility for its electoral pummelling must be placed squarely on the shoulders of the DPP and its ineptness as a ruling party.
Since it came to power almost six years ago it seems that the party has gradually lost sight of its founding principles, what the party stands for and the kind of people who put it in the position it presently occupies.
Two of the core principles that the DPP once stood for are the promotion of Taiwan and a Taiwanese identity in the face of China's continued threats, and standing up for ordinary citizens.
DPP supporters look to the party to uphold the idea that Taiwan is an independent country and absolutely not a part of China, but since it came to power its policies have not reflected this ideal.
By giving in to business interests time and time again on cross-strait matters the DPP is gradually eroding Taiwan's strong economic identity and helping China to complete its goal of full economic integration with Taiwan (an all too obvious facet of the communist leadership's "united front" tactic).
By pandering to the demands of the business sector and ignoring the rural areas of Taiwan the DPP government is alienating the very people it should be looking after. Bending over backwards to high-powered foreign investors and local business conglomerates may be good for the economy, but it does not necessarily benefit the vast majority of Taiwanese.
Most industrialists and businesspeople are only interested in pleasing their investors and shareholders; they are not concerned about whether their workforce is Chinese or Taiwanese. Allowing them free rein to invest in China will help these companies to boost competitiveness and profitability, and increase the amounts of capital repatriated to Taiwan, but it also puts a few more everyday Taiwanese out of work, Taiwanese who are more than likely to be DPP voters.
Even the KMT, when it was still anti-China under former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), managed to divert full-scale business investment from China with its "go south" policy. Why can't the DPP continue to do the same? It would help to protect Taiwan's identity and bolster national security: two things the DPP reportedly stands for.
Joining the WTO is another case in point. Of course joining such a global organization was somewhat of a coup for Taiwan in its constant struggle for international recognition, and membership certainly benefits the nation's industrialists, businesspeople and consumers. But what benefits does it bring to thousands of small-scale Taiwanese farmers?
Entry into the WTO for Haiti in 1994 and the elimination of agricultural protection resulted in bankruptcy for thousands of chicken and rice farmers within four short years. The population is now totally dependent on the US for imports of cheap rice and turkey meat. In another example, the livelihoods of millions of small-scale and efficient cotton farmers in nations like Benin, Mali, Burkina Faso and Chad are under threat thanks to entry into the WTO and subsidized cotton from richer countries.
Of course Taiwan and its farmers are more competitive and in a better position to compete with cheap imports than those poorer countries, but the case of the "rice bomber" has already highlighted the effects of WTO entry on parts of the nation's agriculture sector.
Remaining outside the WTO is obviously not an option for a manufacturing and trade-based economy like Taiwan's, but policies that protect and help farmers should have been implemented by the government both prior to and following WTO entry. The "rice bomber's" rise surely indicates that this is not the case.
This is another example of the DPP's neglect of its grassroots support. The party needs to revitalize its rural policies, especially as it now faces direct competition from China, which is attempting to woo southern-based farmers from their pan-green leanings with tariff-free fruit imports.
The DPP's supporters are fully aware that the party has its hands tied in the legislature, with the opposition parties constantly blocking its reform and policy proposals, but this cannot be used as an excuse for it deserting them.
The leadership of the DPP really need to take a long hard look at the party and reassess its priorities and start taking care of its party faithful again.
It is no wonder the DPP's supporters deserted it at the recent polls; since it came to power more than five years ago the DPP has been slowly deserting them.
Richard Hazeldine is a Taipei-based writer.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS