The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) only managed to win six seats in the Dec. 3 local elections, and certain elements within the party have been suggesting that the three-in-one format of the elections was to blame. The thinking goes that the DPP, with its relative paucity of resources, overextended itself.
However, my reading of the situation is different, and I think this synopsis fails to address the problems within the party and ignores changes in the nature of local councils that have resulted from the elections. I fear this is a mistake. Everyone seems to be preoccupied with the number of county and city council seats won, and by whom. However, I would like to look at the effect of the polls on council politics, from the point of view of someone who is involved on the local level.
Let's start with voter turnout. As much as 66 percent of the electorate voted this time, compared with 55 percent in the previous local elections four years ago, a significant difference of 11 percentage points. Last time, voter turnout didn't even reach the 50 percent mark in 44 electoral districts around Taiwan, a quarter of all electoral districts. This time, however, the rate topped 70 percent in 62 districts, and voter turnout fell below the 50 percent mark in only two districts.
Voter turnout is an indicator of people's involvement in politics. The significant increase in the number of people voting in the local elections not only represents a marked improvement in current voting behavior, it might also signal an increased willingness on the part of the electorate to supervise and scrutinize the quality of their councils, and to take more interest in public services offered on the local level. This is the most obvious benefit of holding the three elections simultaneously.
Secondly we are seeing party politics take shape in local councils. The number of independent council members has fallen from 36 last time to 25; they now represent less than a third of the total. The number of council seats for the DPP, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union increased by 45, 12 and four, respectively. This heralds the coming of the era of party politics in local councils. In the future we will see less of individuals working for their own interests: This will make for a more responsible political system.
But there are other differences. If we look at the results more closely, we find that the majority of candidates who relied on vote buying or loyalty votes -- and who had previously been able to take advantage of low voter turnout to win elections with relatively few votes -- lost their seats because of the higher voter turnout. On the other hand, there were those who did very well by manipulating their image, gaining popularity through bringing the government to task, or unexpectedly picking up large amounts of "empty votes."
The elections showed us the qualitative requirements of the three-in-one format, but it still remains for parties to guide councilors on how they conduct politics and execute their duties.
It is inappropriate to view the outcome of the elections in terms of success or failure for a particular party. If party leaders are inclined to do this, they are either groping for excuses for failure, or overplaying their own importance in the scheme of things.
Whether holding the elections simultaneously was the correct thing to do rests on whether we see local politics moving in a more democratic direction. From my own experience in local politics, I can see that in a few years, the three-in-one format will no longer be regarded as the reason for the DPP's defeat in these elections. Instead, it will be seen as one of the rare instances of a good decision made by the DPP government in recent years.
Chiu Li-li is a DPP Tainan City councilor.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS