The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) only managed to win six seats in the Dec. 3 local elections, and certain elements within the party have been suggesting that the three-in-one format of the elections was to blame. The thinking goes that the DPP, with its relative paucity of resources, overextended itself.
However, my reading of the situation is different, and I think this synopsis fails to address the problems within the party and ignores changes in the nature of local councils that have resulted from the elections. I fear this is a mistake. Everyone seems to be preoccupied with the number of county and city council seats won, and by whom. However, I would like to look at the effect of the polls on council politics, from the point of view of someone who is involved on the local level.
Let's start with voter turnout. As much as 66 percent of the electorate voted this time, compared with 55 percent in the previous local elections four years ago, a significant difference of 11 percentage points. Last time, voter turnout didn't even reach the 50 percent mark in 44 electoral districts around Taiwan, a quarter of all electoral districts. This time, however, the rate topped 70 percent in 62 districts, and voter turnout fell below the 50 percent mark in only two districts.
Voter turnout is an indicator of people's involvement in politics. The significant increase in the number of people voting in the local elections not only represents a marked improvement in current voting behavior, it might also signal an increased willingness on the part of the electorate to supervise and scrutinize the quality of their councils, and to take more interest in public services offered on the local level. This is the most obvious benefit of holding the three elections simultaneously.
Secondly we are seeing party politics take shape in local councils. The number of independent council members has fallen from 36 last time to 25; they now represent less than a third of the total. The number of council seats for the DPP, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union increased by 45, 12 and four, respectively. This heralds the coming of the era of party politics in local councils. In the future we will see less of individuals working for their own interests: This will make for a more responsible political system.
But there are other differences. If we look at the results more closely, we find that the majority of candidates who relied on vote buying or loyalty votes -- and who had previously been able to take advantage of low voter turnout to win elections with relatively few votes -- lost their seats because of the higher voter turnout. On the other hand, there were those who did very well by manipulating their image, gaining popularity through bringing the government to task, or unexpectedly picking up large amounts of "empty votes."
The elections showed us the qualitative requirements of the three-in-one format, but it still remains for parties to guide councilors on how they conduct politics and execute their duties.
It is inappropriate to view the outcome of the elections in terms of success or failure for a particular party. If party leaders are inclined to do this, they are either groping for excuses for failure, or overplaying their own importance in the scheme of things.
Whether holding the elections simultaneously was the correct thing to do rests on whether we see local politics moving in a more democratic direction. From my own experience in local politics, I can see that in a few years, the three-in-one format will no longer be regarded as the reason for the DPP's defeat in these elections. Instead, it will be seen as one of the rare instances of a good decision made by the DPP government in recent years.
Chiu Li-li is a DPP Tainan City councilor.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS