On Tuesday, the Access to Government Information Law (
In the run-up to the Dec. 3 local elections, candidates from both camps suffered the effects of smear campaigns. A "culture of disclosure" overshadowed discussion on public policies and marked a new low for election campaigns. Several lawmakers used their legislative immunity to attack their opponents by disclosing incomplete or false data without stating their sources. Since it was impossible to verify the information, the media became the puppets of political parties. Although the public was fed up with these disclosures halfway through the campaign, it was impossible to end it it.
The new law will change all this. It is now possible to supervise the government and officials, and determine whether they have been involved in misconduct, by carefully searching for, reading, comparing and compiling treaties signed by the government, documents dealing with foreign relations, policy plans, research reports, budgets, public construction and procurement contracts, as well as reports on subsidies to agencies and meeting protocols.
Non-governmental organizations and the media can now request that the government provide the tender documents for the MRT project in Kaohsiung or financial information provided by electoral candidates. Political parties, candidates and reporters will now have the wherewithal to expose government corruption or claim that government policies are inappropriate, while government officials will be able to defend themselves in an open and fair manner.
Article 18 of the law, however, lists nine categories of government information to which access will be limited or denied. These include information legally designated as state secrets and information that is deemed secret under other laws whose publication is limited or prohibited. Information that involves human rights, individual privacy, maintaining fair examinations, benefits to state-operated enterprises and cultural capital, can also be exempted.
The question now is who will define what constitutes a state secret. Because the government is both the supervised and the supervisor, it may put the label "state secret" on information that it does not want publicized, which would lead to disputes.
Article 21 addresses this, stating that an applicant who does not accept the information a government institution has decided to provide has the legal right to file an administrative complaint.
The government should also amend the State Secrets Act (
Friday was International Anti-Corruption Day. The results of the annual Corruption Perception Index showed that Taiwan's ranking among 12 Asian countries fell from fourth in 2003 to sixth this year. The Taiwan chapter of the international non-governmental organization Transparency International also recently published a report saying that about 80 percent of the public believe that the legislature and the political parties are the most corrupt entities in the nation.
Fighting corruption was regarded by many as the most important issue in the local elections, so the Access to Government Information Law has been passed in the nick of time. It will help Taiwan build a society with several monitoring agencies and will promote clean politics.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry