On Tuesday, the Access to Government Information Law (
In the run-up to the Dec. 3 local elections, candidates from both camps suffered the effects of smear campaigns. A "culture of disclosure" overshadowed discussion on public policies and marked a new low for election campaigns. Several lawmakers used their legislative immunity to attack their opponents by disclosing incomplete or false data without stating their sources. Since it was impossible to verify the information, the media became the puppets of political parties. Although the public was fed up with these disclosures halfway through the campaign, it was impossible to end it it.
The new law will change all this. It is now possible to supervise the government and officials, and determine whether they have been involved in misconduct, by carefully searching for, reading, comparing and compiling treaties signed by the government, documents dealing with foreign relations, policy plans, research reports, budgets, public construction and procurement contracts, as well as reports on subsidies to agencies and meeting protocols.
Non-governmental organizations and the media can now request that the government provide the tender documents for the MRT project in Kaohsiung or financial information provided by electoral candidates. Political parties, candidates and reporters will now have the wherewithal to expose government corruption or claim that government policies are inappropriate, while government officials will be able to defend themselves in an open and fair manner.
Article 18 of the law, however, lists nine categories of government information to which access will be limited or denied. These include information legally designated as state secrets and information that is deemed secret under other laws whose publication is limited or prohibited. Information that involves human rights, individual privacy, maintaining fair examinations, benefits to state-operated enterprises and cultural capital, can also be exempted.
The question now is who will define what constitutes a state secret. Because the government is both the supervised and the supervisor, it may put the label "state secret" on information that it does not want publicized, which would lead to disputes.
Article 21 addresses this, stating that an applicant who does not accept the information a government institution has decided to provide has the legal right to file an administrative complaint.
The government should also amend the State Secrets Act (
Friday was International Anti-Corruption Day. The results of the annual Corruption Perception Index showed that Taiwan's ranking among 12 Asian countries fell from fourth in 2003 to sixth this year. The Taiwan chapter of the international non-governmental organization Transparency International also recently published a report saying that about 80 percent of the public believe that the legislature and the political parties are the most corrupt entities in the nation.
Fighting corruption was regarded by many as the most important issue in the local elections, so the Access to Government Information Law has been passed in the nick of time. It will help Taiwan build a society with several monitoring agencies and will promote clean politics.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS