The crisis in Harbin and surrounding areas linked by the Songhua River, the result of a series of explosions at a petrochemical plant earlier this month, highlights two things.
First, in this global village, what one does in one's home can never be one's own business, because neighbors could very well end up paying a hefty price. In this case, Russia is the unlucky neighbor, forced to call a state of emergency for Khabarovsk as the benzene slick floats downriver toward that region.
Second, Chinese officialdom still hasn't learned that honesty and transparency are the best policies in the face of health and environmental hazards or crises.
The explosion at the plant took place on Nov. 13. At the time, there had been speculation on the potential polluting of the Songhua River, but provincial officials refused to come clean on the issue until almost two weeks later. They kept the general public in the dark about a situation that was always going to have an immediate and longer-term impact on water supplies, as well as on the surrounding environment.
Worse still, when the Harbin government announced its decision to shut off the city's water for four days, it flatly denied that it had anything to do with the pollution and insisted that it was being done for other reasons.
Nothing is more agonizing than knowing that something has gone seriously wrong without knowing exactly what it is. This was the predicament faced by Harbin's residents. Most suspected that the shut-down of their water supplies had something to do with pollution caused by the explosion -- Chinese aren't stupid, though their government may think so -- yet, for days, the government could not bring itself to tell them the truth.
In democratic societies, when governments try to sweep dirt under the rug and are found out, they face dire consequences at the hands of both their constituents and an independent legal system.
Unfortunately, in countries such as China, a government can repeatedly lie through its teeth precisely because it does not have to worry about subsequent sanctions.
In the long run, however, behavior of this nature can still cause an autocratic government damage in terms of domestic credibility and its international reputation. And this latter consideration is where the Chinese government can be hit right where it hurts. After all, it is Beijing's aim to become a respectable regional and even world leader. A questionable record on fundamental issues such as protecting the livelihoods of the citizenry and the infrastructure that attracts overseas investors will become a major roadblock on the path to world leadership.
With this latest mishandling of misfortune, it is impossible not to be reminded of China's track record in dealing with the SARS outbreak and the avian flu. At the height of the SARS scare, Beijing chose to stay silent on the extent of the outbreak at home. Had it told the truth in a timely fashion, Taiwan and Hong Kong might have been able to better prepare their campaigns against the disease -- and the number of casualties may have been significantly reduced.
In the wake of the outbreak of bird flu in the region, the Chinese government -- which insists it learned its lesson after the SARS saga -- continues to provoke skepticism over whether it is capable of passing on the facts in a time of emergency. The Songhua River incident can therefore only foster grave doubts about the way Beijing will deal with what experts say is an inevitable bird flu epidemic.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS