When the going gets rough, US presidents leave the country. Ronald Reagan used cold war summitry to bury the Iran-Contra scandal.
Bill Clinton embraced Middle East peacemaking instead of Monica Lewinsky. And the much-berated US President George W. Bush is following suit.
After a dinner yesterday for Prince Charles and Camilla, Bush is off to Latin America and a summit in Argentina. Later this month he will visit Japan, South Korea and China. A trip to Mongolia, where sheep matter more than Lewis Libby, Karl Rove or Vice President Dick Cheney, may provide welcome relief from Washington's rancorous ruminations.
But taking refuge in the role of itinerant international statesman at a time of domestic strife poses particular problems for Bush, given the hostility much of his foreign policy continues to arouse at home and abroad.
Complaining of US indifference, Latin American countries have moved broadly left during his tenure; and tensions with Bolivarist Venezuela and Cuba have sharpened. Last year Bush became the first US president to see his candidate for secretary general of the Organization of American States fail to be appointed.
Another set of problems awaits Bush in Asia, ranging from export, currency and security-related disputes with China and rising anti-US sentiment in South Korea to the supposedly nuclear-armed North Korea.
These tough regional agendas do not take into account other international friction points, notably accelerating US confrontations with Iran and Syria, the ongoing conflict in Iraq, and fraught world trade tariff reduction negotiations in Hong Kong next month. On all these fronts, perceived presidential weakness is certain to be exploited.
No relief at home
Even at home, high-profile international engagement offers little chance of escape for Bush. An independent Public Agenda poll published in Foreign Affairs magazine found that US citizens were concerned about Iraq, poor relations with the Muslim world and illegal immigration. The president also received low marks for "working with other countries to protect the global environment" and "helping improve the lives of people in poor countries."
Bush's political weakness at home, if it continues or worsens, could also undermine his ability to sustain current policies, said Jonathan Eyal of the Royal United Services Institute.
Typically, Congress would increasingly encroach on the executive's territory, inter-departmental turf wars would intensify, and a sense of policy drift would set in.
In such circumstances, and with next year's mid-term elections approaching, electoral calculations become more important, Eyal said.
"The Senate becomes slower to approve presidential appointments and quicker to interfere in policy-making. If there is no consensus and no clear direction from the White House, the military will become less adventurous. That doesn't mean the US is more likely to withdraw from Iraq. Quite the opposite. You are more likely to get a general paralysis," he said.
But while such constraints might help persuade Bush against launching risky new undertakings in Iran or elsewhere, a lack of initiatives from a distracted president and his staff could also have negative results, Eyal said.
"The Israel-Palestine dialogue is collapsing around our ears right now. There's a need for the US to take charge big-time ... A lot of countries will not get the attention they need. Overseas trips and diplomatic summitry are no substitute for serious foreign policy decision-making," he said.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength