When the going gets rough, US presidents leave the country. Ronald Reagan used cold war summitry to bury the Iran-Contra scandal.
Bill Clinton embraced Middle East peacemaking instead of Monica Lewinsky. And the much-berated US President George W. Bush is following suit.
After a dinner yesterday for Prince Charles and Camilla, Bush is off to Latin America and a summit in Argentina. Later this month he will visit Japan, South Korea and China. A trip to Mongolia, where sheep matter more than Lewis Libby, Karl Rove or Vice President Dick Cheney, may provide welcome relief from Washington's rancorous ruminations.
But taking refuge in the role of itinerant international statesman at a time of domestic strife poses particular problems for Bush, given the hostility much of his foreign policy continues to arouse at home and abroad.
Complaining of US indifference, Latin American countries have moved broadly left during his tenure; and tensions with Bolivarist Venezuela and Cuba have sharpened. Last year Bush became the first US president to see his candidate for secretary general of the Organization of American States fail to be appointed.
Another set of problems awaits Bush in Asia, ranging from export, currency and security-related disputes with China and rising anti-US sentiment in South Korea to the supposedly nuclear-armed North Korea.
These tough regional agendas do not take into account other international friction points, notably accelerating US confrontations with Iran and Syria, the ongoing conflict in Iraq, and fraught world trade tariff reduction negotiations in Hong Kong next month. On all these fronts, perceived presidential weakness is certain to be exploited.
No relief at home
Even at home, high-profile international engagement offers little chance of escape for Bush. An independent Public Agenda poll published in Foreign Affairs magazine found that US citizens were concerned about Iraq, poor relations with the Muslim world and illegal immigration. The president also received low marks for "working with other countries to protect the global environment" and "helping improve the lives of people in poor countries."
Bush's political weakness at home, if it continues or worsens, could also undermine his ability to sustain current policies, said Jonathan Eyal of the Royal United Services Institute.
Typically, Congress would increasingly encroach on the executive's territory, inter-departmental turf wars would intensify, and a sense of policy drift would set in.
In such circumstances, and with next year's mid-term elections approaching, electoral calculations become more important, Eyal said.
"The Senate becomes slower to approve presidential appointments and quicker to interfere in policy-making. If there is no consensus and no clear direction from the White House, the military will become less adventurous. That doesn't mean the US is more likely to withdraw from Iraq. Quite the opposite. You are more likely to get a general paralysis," he said.
But while such constraints might help persuade Bush against launching risky new undertakings in Iran or elsewhere, a lack of initiatives from a distracted president and his staff could also have negative results, Eyal said.
"The Israel-Palestine dialogue is collapsing around our ears right now. There's a need for the US to take charge big-time ... A lot of countries will not get the attention they need. Overseas trips and diplomatic summitry are no substitute for serious foreign policy decision-making," he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations