The decision of President Chen Shui-bian (
These are improving the relationship between the Presidential Office and the Legislative Yuan, helping to repair the relationship between his government and some sections of the KMT, and elevating the level of his proxy to the APEC meeting.
However, true to form, Beijing has opposed the idea.
It isn't hard to figure out Beijing's reasons for saying "no." Making Taiwan look bad and constricting Taiwan's breathing space in the international community are pretty safe options when it comes to second-guessing Beijing's motives.
Under the circumstances, the reaction of the pan-blue camp and its leaders are much more noteworthy. Naturally, the pan-blue camp jumped for joy upon hearing the announcement. Even KMT Chairman and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said he would be "happy" to see it happen.
The real interesting twist came when Beijing rejected the idea. Instead of condemning Beijing for rejecting what he had once considered a great idea, Ma went on to blame the Presidential Office for insisting on the appointment while knowing full well that the Chinese government would say "no."
There are some obvious problems in the logic underlying Ma's position. First, since when has it been a rule that Taiwan must seek the approval of Beijing when appointing delegates to APEC's informal summit meeting? Even if the host country has typically deferred to the relentless and unreasonable demands of Beijing, it is an entirely different matter if people in Taiwan began to see the blessing of Beijing as the top priority when deciding who to send.
Then there is the talk by pan-blue camp members about helping to resolve the problem through its "channels of communication" with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as if they genuinely believe that they have a shot at changing the CCP's position. On second thought, perhaps they already know that they have no chance, so they are saying that their communication with the CCP would have been easier had it taken place before Beijing said no.
But, didn't Chen tell Wang weeks earlier? Why didn't they begin the talks then?
Ever since former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
The only reason that the Chinese leadership was willing to extend the pan-blue leaders a half-decent reception was because this added great value to the Chinese unification propaganda campaign by endorsing the "Greater China" ideology. There is nothing more to the relationship. It is about time everyone saw the truth for what it is.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS