Suddenly, next month's German election looks like the 2002 vote which Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder narrowly won after wading into deadly Elbe River floods and leading European opposition to the Iraq war.
Observers rubbed their eyes in disbelief as Schroeder -- nicknamed "The Comeback Kid" for pulling off upsets -- announced he would be rushing to Bavaria yesterday to visit regions devastated by floodwaters pouring out of the Alps.
The chancellery has declared the trip to Augsburg an official visit -- not a campaign stop -- meaning Schroeder can fly down in a sleek, Luftwaffe helicopter.
It was not clear if the German leader plans to use the helicopter to tour the entire flood region and make other stops. In 2002, he donned rubber boots and a Border Police raincoat during visits to devastated flood areas, showing that he was taking charge of relief efforts. TV producers and photographers loved it.
For conservative challenger Angela Merkel -- who leads Schroeder in opinion polls -- this year's floods are a worrying development, even if they appear to be receding and have caused less damage.
Alarmed that electioneering looks bad amid a natural disaster, her Christian Democratic alliance (CDU/CSU) abruptly canceled a rally planned in Berlin for Wednesday with its Free Democratic Party ally.
A political cartoon in the city's Tagesspiegel newspaper showed a glum Merkel watching flood coverage on TV, while in the next room Schroeder and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer are almost jumping in glee over the same pictures.
"This is the turning point!" Fischer shouts.
Iraq was also injected back into the campaign on Tuesday when it was revealed that Schroeder has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize for his role in opposing the 2003 US-led Iraq war.
"Peace Prize for the Chancellor? Will this save him?" was the page one headline in Wednesday's Bild tabloid, Germany's biggest selling daily.
And further down was the caption, "And the floods are back again," followed by a photo of a Merkel election poster half-covered by rushing floodwaters.
Schroeder is widely believed to have pulled off his razor-thin election win in 2002 thanks to the Elbe floods and the Iraq crisis which drew attention away from Germany's soaring unemployment and economic problems.
In another parallel to 2002, the chancellor earlier this month shifted attention from Iraq to Iran and called on US President George W. Bush to rule out using military force against Tehran's nuclear program.
"Take the military option off the table -- we have already seen it doesn't work!" Schroeder said at a rally with thousands of cheering supporters in his native Hanover.
Schroeder later added: "The situation is very serious. I view the military option as highly dangerous. Therefore I can clearly rule out any participation of the German government under my leadership."
This was a clear echo of his repeated "nein" to sending troops to Iraq which was a stock part of his campaign speech in 2002.
Schroeder was replying to remarks by Bush in which the US president repeated that he would consider using force against Iran as a last resort to halt its nuclear program.
With less than four weeks to Germany's planned Sept. 18 election, the question is whether this mix of floods, Iraq and Iran can save the chancellor's ruling Social Democratic (SPD) coalition with Greens from defeat.
Most analysts answer "no."
Klaus-Peter Schoeppner, head of the Emnid polling agency, says Schroeder has remained a constant 13 percentage points behind Merkel and that there is no way he can catch up in the time left.
"The threat in 2005 is the economic situation," said Schoeppner in a Bild interview.
Although major German companies are posting record earnings, the economy has been in stagnation for five years and unemployment is at almost 12 percent.
Forsa polling agency chief Manfred Guellner agreed: "The whole thing won't help the SPD."
University of Mainz political scientist Juergen Falter also downplays Schroeder's chances by saying jobs and the economy are the top voter concerns.
Only Elizabeth Noelle of the Allensbach polling agency cautioned that Schroeder's charisma should not be ruled out as a major election factor.
Merkel's CDU/CSU and FDP ally lead in Germany's top six polls with between 49 and 51 percent. In contrast, Schroeder's SPD-Greens government has between 36 and 38 percent.
A newly founded Left Party is at between 8 and 10 percent. Some analysts predict that a strong Left Party result, combined with last-minute Schroeder gains, could hinder Merkel from winning a majority.
This could force Merkel to seek a grand coalition with Schroeder's SPD as junior partner -- a constellation both leaders say they don't want.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS