What is the purpose of the Sino-Russian military exercise entitled "Peace Mission 2005" that began on Thursday? To answer this question, we have to look at the background of the exercise.
The first stage started on July 1, 2002, when Japanese-language daily the Sankei Shimbun quoted diplomatic sources in Beijing as saying that the Chinese and Russian armies were going to hold a joint exercise in Siberia, northeastern China, the Sea of Japan and the Yellow Sea, with the US as the simulated enemy.
Postponement
The exercise was set to take place in August and September that year. It was called "Cooperation 2005," and the goal was to attack terrorists.
Without explanation, however, the exercise was postponed.
The second stage began on Feb. 3 this year, when Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Kong Quan (孔泉) said at a news conference that China and Russia were going to hold a joint military exercise in the second half of the year. Afterward, Russian media revealed that the two countries were planning to send 100 people each to participate in the exercise, which was initially planned for August and September, but that it might be postponed until October.
It was to take place in the Yellow Sea and on the Liaodong Peninsula, and the exercises would include surrounding and capturing terrorists and drug smugglers.
The third stage began in late June, before Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
The revisions
Looking at these changes, a few points stand out. First, China initiated the exercise but then retired into the background after the basic format had been decided to let the Russian army promote it in the media. Second, the original name, "Cooperation," was changed to "Peace." Third, the number of participants rose sharply from 200 to 8,000. Fourth, August was chosen for the exercise. Fifth, the exercise area was expanded to include Shandong Peninsula.
Why did these changes occur and what do they tell us?
It seems that the "colored" revolution that took place not long ago prompted China and Russia to greatly expand the scope of the exercise to display their strength for the US to see.
The target?
As for the purpose of the exercise, it is said that they are not aiming it at any one specific country, but no one continues to stress the original anti-terrorist purpose, and I don't think that too many people will believe that 8,000 troops would be mobilized to surround and capture terrorists and smugglers.
Changing the name only served to make its purpose even clearer. So what is the main purpose of the exercise?
Military experts believe that it is aimed at Taiwan, the US and Japan. Russian media share this point of view, and some even oppose Russian involvement in the cross-strait dispute, adding that Russia is allowing itself to be used by China.
Judging from the location of the exercise, however, it is targeting Japan, with both the location and timing being very sensitive to Japan.
War wounds
The drill was postponed from 2002 to 2005, and of the three months of August, September and October, August was chosen. Although the exercise officially began on Aug. 18, the pre-exercise began on Aug. 15, which was the 60th anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender, and it became a major part of China's celebrations of the end of its war of resistance against Japan.
The inclusion of the Shandong Peninsula in the exercise was also aimed at Japan. After the Russo-Japanese War began in 1904, the Japanese army routed the Russian army in Lushunkou and other places on the Liaodong Peninsula. This historic wound still smarts with the Russian army. As such, it made more sense to hold the exercise on the Shandong Peninsula and make it a sea and air invasion, because although the area belonged to Germany before World War I, Japan took over the German concessions in China after the war, which led to the May Fourth movement.
According to the last report on the exercise, Siberia was only used for a meeting that was held in Vladivostok between the Russian and Chinese leaders of the exercise.
That meeting was followed by a simulation of the exercise. Two days later the exercise began on the Shandong Peninsula and in the Yellow Sea next to Japan, basically unconnected to the Liaodong Peninsula.
One could say that this exercise is directed by Beijing to achieve the best political and military results.
For Russia, in addition to being dissatisfied with the US over several issues, the reason it wanted to participate was basically that, since Beijing is footing the bill for the exercise, Russia could use it as a free opportunity to display Russian-made arms.
China of course had its reasons for targeting Japan with the exercise.
First, aiming at Japan is the best way to stir up nationalist fervor among the Chinese public. Second, it was warning Japan that it must not sympathize with and support Taiwan. Third, it increases public support for the idea that a war with Japan is necessary. Fourth, it threatens Japan into giving way on disputes over territorial and energy issues. Fifth, it warns the US, which supports Japan.
On Alert
The security of Taiwan, the US and Japan has become one and the same issue. In addition to reinforcing these three nations' determination to resist threats, China's joining up with Russia in a military exercise will also put Asia and the rest of the world on alert and cause them to work harder to protect the peace in the Asian region.
This is the result of putting the word "peace" in "Peace Mission 2005." We can only guess what the impression will be on the Chinese public of seeing Russia making a grand entrance and replacing the Japanese Imperial Army.
Paul Lin is a freelance writer based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS