The eight-day Chinese-Russian military exercise that opened yesterday has been dubbed "Peace Mission 2005."
The joint military exercise focuses mainly on an amphibious landing in the Bohai Gulf along the coast of northeastern China.
Both sides will be using elite assault troops in the exercise, and also their most advanced fighter-bombers.
The People's Liberation Army's (PLA) overall strategic concept in this exercise is to achieve air superiority prior to launching an amphibious attack. It is not difficult to see what the real target of such an exercise is.
Since 2002, China has held eight joint military exercises with foreign troops, but the current exercise with Russia is the first high-level joint exercise of such complexity that is using equipment of such sophistication.
Although Russia's overall military power still lags behind that of the US, it is still more powerful than that of China.
This is a valuable opportunity for the PLA to improve the efficiency of combined operations with Russia, and also to consolidate relations between the two nations.
This is an indirect indication of an improvement in Chinese-Russian relations, as both nations share the aim of increasing their influence in the Asia-Pacific region.
The Russian government has attached considerable importance to these exercises.
To ensure that the exercises are carried out to the highest standards, the Russian Army has carried out preparatory exercises in their far eastern territories.
The PLA, of course, can use this opportunity to achieve closer ties with senior Russian military figures and verify the effectiveness of the assault craft it is considering purchasing from Russia.
These assault craft include anti-submarine vessels, amphibious landing craft, guided-missile destroyers, nuclear submarines, Bear strategic bombers with guided missile capability, backfire bombers and long-range bombers.
All of these are expected to participate in the exercise.
The US has shown interest in both the scope and format of the drills, as well as the effectiveness of the weapons that are employed.
Washington is even more interested to learn about their methods of communication, the command and control mechanism, the application of electronic parameters and the exchange of intelligence between the two nations.
The exercises are expected to have a significant impact on the balance of power in Asia and are also an opportunity for China and Russia to make the US take note of their growing military strength.
Although China and Russia do not yet stand as equals, their influence in the region is likely to increase.
In the face of closer Chinese-Russian military cooperation, the US must strengthen its ties with Japan, South Korea and other key nations around Asia if it is to consolidate regional security.
As for Taiwan, if the arms-procurement bill can be passed, it will serve as a further safeguarding of the security of the Taiwan Strait.
It will also indirectly strengthen US-Taiwan relations through military cooperation -- and counter the disruption in regional power that has been created by the Chinese-Russian exercise.
Chang Yan-ting is a colonel in the ROC air force, an associate professor at the Air Force Institute of Technology and a strategy instructor at the Military College of the National Defense University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS