After adding the word "Taiwan" to the Presidential Office's Web site last week, President Chen Shui-bian (
Because the name ROC includes the word "republic," it is easily mistaken to mean that the ROC is a state.
However, the name ROC initially symbolized a government or a dynasty, and it was also the official name for China.
After the People's Republic of China (PRC) replaced the ROC as the ruler of China, the only remaining meaning was "government," with the other meanings being supplanted by the PRC. This now means that the PRC is China and China is the PRC.
The ROC only remains as the government's name and its organization. It no longer has the original sense of "state."
Chen is being polite when he describes the second stage of his theory as the ROC "moving" to Taiwan, when it in fact was exiled here and proceeded to -- without passing through any democratic or legal procedures -- begin to occupy Taiwan and Penghu after Japan gave up its claims in a treaty.
In 1971, the UN decided to expel the delegate representing president Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) regime and proclaimed that the PRC was the legitimate representative of China. Afterward, Chiang's son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) began implementing limited localization and promotion of Taiwanese. Taiwan was thus used to fill the empty ROC shell, and the ROC began its transformation toward becoming Taiwan.
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (
In 1999, Lee proposed his "special state to state" model for cross-strait relations, clearly defining the ROC as a "state" rather than a "government." Since both the PRC and the ROC are states, with neither having any jurisdiction over the other, this is clearly a matter of two different countries.
A majority in the international community do not recognize the ROC because they do not view it as a state, but rather as the name of a government that has been replaced by the PRC. If the national title remains unchanged and if we want to maintain that Taiwan or the ROC is a sovereign state, there are only two approaches to altering the definition of the ROC.
First, that Taiwan is a sovereign state whose national title is the ROC. Second, that the ROC is a sovereign state whose territory is limited to the Taiwan region and the sovereignty belongs to the 23 million Taiwanese.
Chen's four-stage theory defines the ROC as a state, but in using territory and population to define the scope of this state, he makes the ROC Taiwan. This is in response to the fact that while the national title "ROC" cannot be altered at this stage, most people believe that Taiwan is a sovereign state. Since any sudden change is impossible, this is a necessary and natural development.
Shen Chieh is a political commentator based in Washington.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS