Yesterday marked the 60th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and the beginning of the end of the World War II. Within seconds, hundreds of thousands of people perished and thousands more continued to suffer from radiation-related illnesses in years to come. The two cities were reduced to rubble.
Nuclear weapons, the most formidable and destructive weapons ever invented and then built by mankind, have cast a dark shadow over humanity for six decades. In the wake of the horrific explosions, the international community sought to bring the genie under control, if not put it back in the bottle, through the Baruch Plan. But the onset of the Cold War rendered this first nuclear arms control effort a futile one.
Between 1949 and 1964, the Soviet Union, Great Britain, France and China all acquired nuclear weapons capabilities. The world lived under the danger of nuclear Armageddon as the US and the Soviet Union competed for primacy and each built huge nuclear arsenals.
The 1962 Cuban Missile crisis and the concern over the spread of nuclear weapons to other countries led to the negotiation and conclusion of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968. Since its entry into force in 1970, the NPT has become the most inclusive and legally binding international treaty committing nations to forswear and eventually give up nuclear weapons.
It helped persuade countries such as Argentina and Brazil to halt their nuclear weapons program; secured the accession of Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan as non-nuclear weapons states in the aftermath of the Soviet Union's breakup; and it saw South Africa give up its nuclear arsenal.
But the treaty is facing serious challenges today. The NPT has yet to achieve universality as India, Pakistan and Israel -- three states that either have or are assumed to have nuclear weapons -- remain outside of the regime. In addition, North Korea's withdrawal from the treaty and Iran's controversial nuclear program have further undermined the international nuclear nonproliferation regime. And there is the growing threat of nuclear terrorism.
Closer to home, East Asia remains a region with unresolved historical grievances, territorial disputes, divided nations and growing rivalry. Three nuclear weapons states have important -- and at times conflicting -- security interests in the region. Both Taiwan and South Korea in the past tinkered with the idea of acquiring nuclear weapons.
Likewise, Japan also considered modifying its nuclear weapons policy at one time. A nuclear arms race is never a far-fetched scenario in this volatile geostrategic hotspot.
On the anniversaries of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it is all the more important to reinvigorate efforts to prevent such horror and destruction from occurring in our life time or in that of future generations. Several steps need to be taken.
First, nuclear states must reconfirm their commitment to disarmament and establish a credible and realistic timetable toward that end. Serious negotiation should include all nuclear weapons states and the framework agreed upon must be legally binding and with enforceable and verifiable milestones and targets.
Second, the use and threat of using nuclear weapons must be de-legitimized. Nuclear weapons states should adopt the no-first-use principle and re-pledge their security assurance to non-nuclear weapons states. Research and development of new types of nuclear weapons would only encourage countermeasures and hence lower the threshold for their use.
Third, member states must re-define what is and what is not permissible peaceful nuclear use, in particular the critical phases of nuclear fuel cycle -- uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing -- that could contribute to development of nuclear weapons. In addition, the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) ability to conduct inspections and enforce compliance must be strengthened.
Fourth, efforts must also be made to safeguard the security of nuclear facilities and materials to prevent acquisition and attacks by terrorist groups. UN Security Council Resolution 1540, which calls on member states to enforce national export controls to prevent terrorist access to items and technologies relevant to the development of weapons of mass destruction, needs to be fully implemented.
Finally, the international community must address the issues of poverty and inequality, and inter-state disputes and rivalry, which are the sources of conflicts and armament, including the pursuit of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. Confidence-building, peace and development can go a long way toward eliminating some of these woes.
On a day of memory and prayers, the best way to ensure that the tragedies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki will not be forgotten and are never allowed to happen again is to make every effort to prevent the future use of nuclear weapons, strengthen international nonproliferation efforts and strive for the ultimate elimination of nuclear weapons.
Yuan Jing-dong is research director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies and an associate professor of international policy studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies.
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS