Richard Hartzell's various musings to the Taipei Times in which he concludes that, to put it simply, Taiwan is a "foreign territory under the dominion of the US," may have some merit in fact, but the problem is this: No one cares.
How many column inches could be filled in this newspaper by listing the war crimes (in fact) and contraventions of the Geneva Conventions (in fact) by the US in Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba?
The illegal use of cluster bombs and the improved version of napalm? The "intelligence and facts being fixed around the policy"?
The list goes on and on, yet one thing shines through like a diamond-piercing light: No one cares.
These things are happening or have happened right under the noses of everyone on the planet and will affect relations among nations for at least a generation, probably longer. But no one cares.
The fact is that even if Hartzell is correct in his assessment, the incidents surrounding Taiwan's status were too long ago, too far removed from anything relevant today and would necessitate some inconceivably massive and influential expression of concern by the US -- clearly more than it is showing at present for point-blank international illegalities and bald-faced misprision -- the same country that Hartzell exhorts to see the truth in the Taiwan issue.
Hartzell might as well have deciphered a new line from the Rosetta Stone for all his theory is worth.
Interesting as an academic study, it's useless and obscure in today's world of contempt for the rule of law.
Mark Wolfe
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with