The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Wednesday unanimously passed a proposal to have outgoing chairman Lien Chan (連戰) serve as the party's honorary chairman after he steps down next month. Accepting the title specifically created for him, Lien said that he would be a "lifetime volunteer" for the party.
To simplify matters, the KMT has so far not considered amending its regulations and formalizing the post. In other words, the title of honorary chairman has been presented to Lien and Lien alone -- no succeeding chairmen are likely to enjoy such an esteemed designation.
But is Lien really fit for the title? And does the KMT really need to have an honorary chairman? In all of its history, the KMT has only had five chairmen: Sun Yat-sen (
Has Lien, a two-time presidential election loser, really outperformed his predecessors? The Chinese Communist Party, despite all of its dictatorial trappings and inclinations, did not have a special title created for paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (
The very fact that the title had to be made up suggests the KMT has ignored the grassroots voters who comprehensively rejected Lien's favored candidate and thus is yet to ditch its feudalist thinking -- observe the new generation of leaders scratching their heads over what to do with their vain predecessors. Worse, the creation of an honorary position may affect future party operations.
After Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
But let's not forget Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-ping (
Given that Lien will serve as the president of a KMT-linked think tank in addition to being honorary chairman, the question needs to be asked: Will he continue to pull the strings?
Since cross-strait affairs will probably be one of the central concerns of Lien's think tank, who now will have the last word on cross-strait policy?
"It's better to quit while you're ahead," as they say. Lien doesn't believe in this old slice of wisdom, and so he is not likely to reconsider accepting the honorary chairman's post. Having finally presided over something the KMT can be proud of -- a genuinely democratic party election -- Lien could have taken a graceful bow and left the stage.
Instead, he is likely to make himself an even bigger laughingstock as the KMT struggles to transform itself into a genuinely democratic party of the present.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS