The legislature failed to surprise anyone yesterday when it went into recess after one of the most miserable sessions in its history. The question it has raised for the people of Taiwan is how to sort out the political mess that the legislature has created.
The legislature is a microcosm of the political environment. When the larger political environment is in chaos, the legislature cannot conduct its debates in peace. This session coincided with the presidential election. Prior to the election, the mood between the government and opposition was confrontational, so naturally the legislative process did not proceed smoothly. After the elections, due to the pan-blue contention that the election results were invalid, and that the election itself was invalid, legislators used debates in the legislature to express their opinions on the election, and even used the excuse that they did not recognize the "illegitimate government" of Chen Shui-bian (
But the pan-blues' position is self-contradictory, with legislators refusing to hear the "illegitimate" premier's report, but then engaging in interpellation sessions in the afternoon. And despite rejecting the inauguration of an "illegitimate" president, they happily approved the appointment of Wu Rong-ming (
Both sides seem to have lost their common sense due to the current state of confrontation. The opposition simply wants to incapacitate the government, while the government is exerting itself to the utmost in its search for loopholes to escape the normal oversight of the legislative process. The NT$500 billion special budget for infrastructure projects and another for the purchase of advanced weapons have not gone through regular legislative procedures, and neither have the dozen or so bills related to people's rights that have become cannon fodder in the battle between the government and the opposition.
Since his re-election, Chen has abandoned the legislative battlefield, directing his effort at the government's administrative functions. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has always been weak in the legislature, and now that its numbers have been further reduced, it has adopted a defensive posture, maintaining essential administrative functions while putting controversial legislation and special budget allocations on the back burner until after the legislative elections at the end of the year.
If the pan-blues continue their forceful obstruction of bills and budget items, the DPP will bring the issue to the public to accumulate ammunition for the year-end election campaign. If the pan-blues do not want to get tied down by legislative fighting and let these bills and budget items pass, the DPP will also have won. If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the PFP continue to concentrate their strength in ostentatious legislative boycotts to keep themselves in the media spotlight, they will only be using up their political capital.
Both the ruling and opposition camps have their own political designs, and the result of the confrontation between the two is political unrest and reduced government functionality, the negative results of which are borne by society, which is the ultimate victim of this dispute. Accumulated public anger will become the force driving legislative reform, a force that will manifest itself in the legislative elections.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under