Club crackdown an affront
In the early hours of Saturday morning, Taipei's beleaguered police force carried out a three-hour crackdown on a popular local dance club that sent the activist reforms of the Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
A contingent of armed police officers raided a primarily gay club called Texound at around 2:30am, shutting down the music and forcing nearly 1,000 people to kneel on the ground, their hands in the air, for 30 minutes. One police officer told the kneeling crowd that any drugs found near them would be considered theirs -- this despite international precedents that would invalidate any such finding in a court of law.
Though I am supportive of police efforts to crack down on drug use in Taipei, I believe their totalitarian methods invalidate the law they are meant to protect. The police officers in question -- and the mayor whom they represented -- owe nearly 1,000 people an apology. Police officers were uncooperative with people there. They refused to give any timeline on how long the police would raid. They would not allow people to use the bathroom.
And, probably most troubling, they refused to allow people who had left their keys or other personal things in club lockers to retrieve them. Taipei should reimburse the club-goers that took cabs -- and pay for the hours that people were forced to wait outside in chilly, drizzly weather.
I'm particularly troubled by the police force's raid of a gay club just hours after a landmark rally that may make Taiwan one of the world's most gay-friendly -- at least in principle -- countries. Police raids that target gay clubs when other equally-notorious clubs are left alone should send a warning signal that the activist reforms pushed by Taiwanese politicians are dead in the water.
This is not my first run-in with police in Taiwan, only the worst. This was the third time I have been in a gay establishment that was raided by the police. I encourage Ma to issue a blanket apology to the people who paid to have a good night and were instead manhandled by police. The city should reconsider reimbursing people for cutting short a night that was meant to be celebratory but ended up being spent kneeling on a dirty floor, hands on their knees.
Eric Lee
Taipei
Ma will stew in his own juice
Last Wednesday, the DPP-led Cabinet approved a draft referendum law, which predominantly aims to expand the scope of direct democracy. Such an establishment can be translated as a triumph in democracy by a nation.
However, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman, and Taipei mayor, Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma was also quoted as saying, "What's not written in the Constitution is not permissible."
Despite holding a doctorate in law, Ma somehow failed to remember that the very nature of the laws is adapting the rules to the status quo, rather than living by the same code year in and year out. The best way to interpret the laws, particularly the Constitution, should be the exact opposite of what Ma said. What is not restricted in the Constitution should be possibly permissible.
The laws have their own multipurpose mechanisms in order to serve many means, as long as those means fit into the interests of the people. Furthermore, the incumbent DPP has no need to listen to Ma, since Ma was contradicting himself as a member of the KMT. Back in 1948, it was the leaders of the KMT that activated Martial Law and bypassed the Constitution, hurting the interests of the people.
As we know, to renounce people's rights to speak, to act and to participate in politics is to deny them the very thing that makes us a democratic country. Now Ma is harking back to that earlier era, stemming the tide of democracy just like Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) did half a century ago. It's a mystery what Ma is thinking. Could his words mean that he has other fish to fry and is using this debate as a tactical maneuver? Nonetheless, for years Ma has always learned what it takes to get ahead. But now it seems that he is likely to stew in his own juice.
Iap Hong-sum
Taipei
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
RSS