In a recent article in a Chinese-language newspaper, medical researcher Chen Yao-chang (陳耀昌) said fewer young Taiwanese academics are attending academic meetings abroad and fewer Taiwanese students abroad are publishing articles in important international periodicals. Quoting data from the Ministry of Edu-cation, he said the number of Taiwanese studying overseas has fallen by 30 percent in recent years.
For the biotechnological field, Chen's speciality, he suggested the introduction of top researchers from China. Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh (李遠哲) made a similar suggestion while he was still teaching at Berkeley. As everyone knows, Indian engineers benefitted from the development of Singapore's computer and information industries. The glory of Silicon Valley in the 1990s to a large extent depended on overseas students from India, Taiwan and other Asian countries.
The question of whether talented high-tech personnel should be imported is an economic issue that can be rationally evaluated. Such economic behavior involves mutual incentives and benefits, and in an era when labor is moving freely around the globe, has become the norm. Labor mobility of course has a political and social impact, but those issues can be planned for on a systemic level.
The more interesting question is why fewer Taiwanese are choosing to study overseas. Is it because higher education in this country is improving? Or is it because the younger generation feels that the benefits of higher education don't meet the cost and so they are not motivated to make the investment?
Since the 1980s and 1990s, more Taiwanese have returned from studying abroad to take up teaching positions and this has improved the quality of higher education in the country. During the first year or two after the Tiananmen massacre in 1989, China interacted less with the outside world and this allowed more Taiwanese the chance to study at top schools in Europe and the US. Taiwanese were also gradually accepted at research institutions where only few had been accepted in the past.
However, a big change took place in the second half of the 1990s. Taiwanese now have a much smaller chance of being accepted at first-rate schools in Europe and the US than do students from China and the same is true for Taiwanese trying to gain employment in US academic institutions upon graduation.
Taiwan's youth also have less interest in pursuing higher studies. At most, they simply want to study abroad. Many see higher education simply as an opportunity to postpone employment. Many teachers also say that men are increasingly reluctant to go on to postgraduate studies, and that their quality is falling further behind that of women.
These issues cannot be blamed on the educational reform chaos. These young university graduates are not the guinea pigs of educational re-form. Academic experts critical of the reforms also say the teaching materials they have been given for middle schools are the best ever.
This is the biggest problem for educational reform -- when the economy is at its best and educational conditions are at their most stable, the will of young people to go on to higher studies is at its weakest. Some middle-aged intellectuals critical of the educational reforms often base a rejection of these reforms on their own experience.
Reality proves, however, that even young students trained using the educational methods of the older generation do not strive toward achievement and are unable to motivate themselves toward new achievements. This has already caused Taiwan's competitiveness to decline. Doesn't this also prove that educational reform is absolutely necessary?
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.