According to the United Daily News, a World Health Organization (WHO) expert said in an interview with a Hong Kong newspaper, Wen Wei Po, that WHO experts, in the absence of China's consent, will be unable to accept Taiwan's invitation for a visit. Although everyone is familiar with China's pressure on Taiwan, and WHO experts feel powerless to change the situation, I would like to share my views, after recently visiting Japan and South Korea to lobby for Taiwan's entry into the WHO.
First, many people, including Chinese Health Minister Zhang Wenkang (張文康), believe Taiwan is pursuing a political objective by taking advantage of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) problem to gain entry into the WHO. I do not deny that political pressure is the greatest obstacle to the nation's admission to the WHO, but I want to clarify that the so-called political problem faced by Taiwan has many dimensions.
China's obstruction is one of these dimensions. Taiwan's appeal following the SARS outbreak is absolutely out of consideration for people's health. Politics is the kind of trouble from which we want to keep away at a time like this. WHO experts felt uneasy and powerless when they faced the problem of not being able to visit Taiwan. Does this seem like a situation where Taiwan is ignoring the people's health rights or is using the people's health rights as the means to achieve a political objective?
In the spirit of WHO's purpose and value, the WHO, China and Taiwan should put aside their political debate until the World Health Assembly has an opportunity to discuss Taipei's request for admission to the organization. Otherwise, after spending almost 10 years in a blind alley we still have no way out in terms of resolving a pressing public health issue. Finally, the SARS epidemic has offered us a shortcut. Therefore, Taiwan should look at the big picture from a different angle by considering its contribution to preventing the spread of the SARS epidemic. The government should share its SARS-prevention and treatment experiences and techniques with the world, in order to facilitate international exchange for the nation's medical profession.
During my recent trip abroad, I had the opportunity to discuss the country's situation with ex-WHO experts. They are interested in neither the political struggle between Taiwan and China, which is clearly a political reality that cannot be helped, nor Taipei's presence in the international arena. On the contrary, they are most interested in Taiwan's implementation of SARS-control measures and medical treatment. They believe this nation's expertise in fighting SARS is valuable, an area in which Taiwan can show its knowledge and ability.
I do not deny the political problem between Taiwan and the WHO. Instead, the political problem is still the greatest obstacle that deprives the Taiwanese people of their health rights, which should not be ignored. The political problem is not this country's fault. However, we need to treat the complexity of this political problem with great prudence, making it a long-term goal to push for Taiwan's entry into the WHO.
In the meantime, we should deal with the SARS threat and prevent the spread of the disease as quickly as possible, by making the international community aware of the nation's importance and contribution to the world. It will be a blessing for Taiwan if other countries get to know us this way.
Wu Shuh-min is the president of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
The Presidential Office on Saturday reiterated that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation after US President Donald Trump said that Taiwan should not “go independent.” “We’re not looking to have somebody say: ‘Let’s go independence because the United States is backing us,’” Trump said in an interview with Fox News aired on Friday. President William Lai (賴清德) on Monday said that the Republic of China (ROC) — Taiwan’s official name — and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are not subordinate to each other. Speaking at an event marking the 40th anniversary of the establishment of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Lai said