Turn on any TV channel or pick up any newspaper these days and you see images of civilians killed or injured in the Iraq war, with comments and articles insinuating the "injustice" of the US-led attack. You would think that Taiwanese have been overwhelmed by criticism of the government's support for US military action to overthrow and disarm Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. In addition to criticizing US President George W. Bush for starting the war, these editorials and commentaries in pro-China media have used the issue to cast President Chen Shui-bian (
These suggestive articles try to draw similarities between Bush and Chen aside from the fact that they are both presidents. They take the word "war" as the link and the logic quickly spirals into a dangerous fantasy-world. The Chinese threat of war against this nation has nothing to do with the nature of the US-led attack on Iraq, but both refer to "war" and that's enough for schizophrenic pro-China media to create a stir. No wonder, local TV channels and newspapers have, time and again, coupled the horrifying images of casualties in Iraq with criticism against Chen for supporting the US' decision to depose Saddam Hussein violently and thereby tacitly encourage China to take pre-emptive action against Taiwan.
These reports reflect the basic message of the pro-China camp: Look, they say, war is so terrible. Do you really want to follow Chen down the dead-end road of war between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait? And US imperialism is so evil, they drone on. The West invaded our China a century ago and now it's invading Iraq. Why don't the people of Taiwan rise up and express their anger?
The historical experience of Taiwanese over the past century has been very different from that of the pro-unification groups that hail from China. Facing round-the-clock bombardment of propaganda on TV channels and brainwashing in newspapers, many ordinary people have become in fact bewildered. They do not understand the reason for fighting, nor what the fundamental interests that Taiwan has in this war.
This bewilderment keeps them from gaining a realistic picture and it indicates to us that mind games are endemic to much of Taiwan's media. Local media can be considered not so much an instrument of community as it is one of the pro-unification camp thanks to these mind games.
Ultimately the local media landscape reveals the tragedy that most media are controlled by the pro-unification camp. This can be traced back to the KMT's White Terror period, during which the public had such deep fears of participating in politics and public affairs that even local elite chose careers in areas relatively untouched by politics such as science, engineering or commerce. Grinding rural poverty led ambitious natives without China ties to try and leave the agricultural sector, and they were even more likely to seek politically clean careers in areas such as health care and trade.
The majority remain a minority in the nation's cultural, legal, political and mass-media spheres. Far-sighted people have tried to reverse the imbalance, but their efforts have not yielded desirable results because people from Mandarin-speaking families naturally speak eloquent Mandarin. Most TV reporters are still multi-generation immigrants from China because of their perfect accent. This explains why FTV's news channel is a stronghold for the pro-unification voice even though FTV is chaired by DPP Legislator Trong Chai (蔡同榮). How could such a lop-sided media environment reflect the sentiments of the majority?
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s