The latest accusations about James Soong claim he was the recipient of US$400 million in kickbacks from the French company Thomson CSF in return for Taiwan's purchase of six Lafayette frigates in 1991. This paper has never made any secret of its doubts about Soong's honesty; there are still far too many unresolved questions concerning the Chunghsing Bills Finance scandal for that -- the property investments in California, why Soong told so many different stories, why he would put money in a bank account in his son's name ...
But we do not expect that even Soong is capable of pocketing US$400 million himself. If the allegations by former French foreign minster Roland Dumas turn out to be true, then it is a fair assumption that Soong was simply the bagman, the man who picked up the kickback money to then spread it around among the many outstretched sweaty palms of the KMT. The frigate scandal was a scam on such a huge scale that there are probably few in the upper echelons of the KMT at the time who did not have their snouts in the Thomson trough.
In this sense then, the Dumas allegations do not so much impugn Soong's good name -- partly of course because he doesn't have one, but we will let that pass for the moment -- as much as they remind us that the Lafayette scandal has still never been fully dealt with.
Almost a year ago Minister of Defense Tang Yao-ming told the legislature's defense committee that the ongoing rumors, suspicions and allegations were a burden for the military and that this issue needed to be settled. We also saw, last year, some navy officers charged with corruption over the Lafayette deal. But these were small fry, certainly not the main recipients of US$400 million of French largesse. A Control Yuan report was released almost exactly a year ago. At the time we were told that it was comprehensive and was being forwarded to the Supreme Court Prosecutor General's Office. We looked forward to some major indictments being handed down. What we saw last year were a number of lower-level officers accused of not following the proper bureaucratic procedures. This seems to be putting the flimsy cart of how paper pushers pushed paper before the rather muscular equine of, as Deep Throat so memorably advised, following the money.
The Lafayette scandal is not a military scandal, it is a political scandal. The decision to buy the frigates was taken at the highest government levels. The money paid by Thomson was not given to obscure military officers. It was given to a very senior official; the secretary-general of the ruling party, says Dumas, thereby fingering Soong. Perhaps he means the secretary-general of some other branch of government -- the Cabinet or the Presidential Office, says the PFP. After all, they reason with nauseating condescension, he's French, maybe he doesn't know Taiwan's system.
Well, maybe he doesn't, which is why it is important now to send a team to France to interview Dumas and find out exactly what he knows and how he knows it. But it is clear from his remarks that the payments were funneled through a very senior official and were destined for the highest levels of government. And remember, this is not French money, it is our money. The cost of the bribes were simply appended to the bill for the frigates to be paid by Taiwan taxpayers. What it involves is a breach of trust at the highest level. Yet no officials have even been named let alone charged as a result of the so-called investigation. Why is the DPP government so averse to pushing this case? We can understand why the KMT wouldn't want a real investigation. But who exactly is the DPP trying to protect?
Belgians, like Taiwanese, often get told that their country does not exist. My memories of early adult life in Brussels have served me well in Taiwan. When I first landed in the city of Kaohsiung, I had the strange feeling that I was going back home. At the time, I was living in Australia, but Kaohsiung felt much closer to Brussels than Sydney ever did. I know first-hand the feeling of being told that one’s country is not a real country. In my case, it came from UK politician Nigel Farage — who told the European parliament in 2018 that
“Did you know that Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) was an American citizen?” The question was posed over dinner a few weeks ago by a colleague of ours. Of us all, he is by far the best Mandarin speaker and encyclopedic in all things Chinese. For decades, we have gathered quarterly for martinis, early dinner and diplomatic war stories in Rosslyn, Virginia, a few blocks from the Washington, DC headquarters of the American Institute in Taiwan. In the 1970s, we were young diplomats and attaches together at the US Embassy in Taipei and later in Beijing. We all are retired now, yet
Micron Technology Inc and its South Korean peers face an intractable problem. With data centers for artificial intelligence gobbling up supplies of their memory chips, there are not enough to go around. This scarcity is forcing up memory prices and making Micron, SK Hynix Inc and Samsung Electronics Co astonishingly profitable. But customers are unhappy, governments could intervene and shortages may open the door to Chinese rivals. As recently as 2023, memory manufacturers were suffering huge losses as demand and selling prices collapsed. This is still a cyclical industry but I think the bigger risk right now is this trio
Chinese university academics convening at Jinan University in China’s Guangzhou Province on June 30 “unanimously concluded” that the Batanes Islands, the Philippines’ northernmost province, is a “natural geographical extension of Taiwan.” As Beijing claims Taiwan, the argument runs, the Batanes belongs to China as well. Consider the architecture. Premise one: Taiwan belongs to China. False. The People’s Republic has never governed Taiwan for a single day in its 77 years. Premise two: The Batanes are an extension of Taiwan. Also false, and embarrassingly so. Two false premises marching toward a conclusion that would not survive a first-year logic seminar, delivered
RSS