Bjarne Gislefoss (徐賓諾), former superintendent of the Puli Christian Hospital, his wife Alfhild Gislefoss (紀歐惠) and Doris Brougham (彭蒙惠), founder of the English magazine Studio Classroom (空中英語教室), have dedicated themselves to Taiwan for over 40 years. They are more Taiwanese than some Taiwanese people, but they cannot obtain permanent residency visas under current regulations.
Only through parades and petitions are they able to attract the government's attention. No wonder the media has raised doubts that the threshold for loving Taiwan enough to become permanent residents is too high.
Whenever the Medical Dedication Award (醫療奉獻獎) is presented, foreign missionaries and nuns are always seen on the list with their stories of unselfish lifelong dedication to Taiwan and its people. Davide Luigi Giordan (何義士), Italian superintendent of the Hwey Min Hospital in Penghu, was awarded the prize three times. Hungarian priest Istvan Jaschko (葉由根) established a center for the mentally retarded in Guanhsi and Samuel Noordhoff (羅慧夫), founder of the Noordhoff Craniofacial Foundation (財團法人羅慧夫顱顏基金會), has devoted his life to boosting the quality of Taiwan's medical care.
The list still goes on -- Sister Lena Bomans (趙懷仁) from Belgium, who serves at the Yung Ho branch of the Cardinal Tien Hospital, established the first foundation for premature infants in Taiwan, enabling numerous prematurely delivered babies to survive. Italian nun Maristella Piergianni (裴嘉妮) is a guardian angel for mentally impaired children. Joy Randall (籃瑪烈) from Canada has dedicated her life to the nursing department in the Changhua Christian Hospital. David Landsborough (蘭大衛), founder of the Changhua Christian Hospital, has also impressed the public with his unselfish dedication.
Our society receives the selfless love and devotion of these people, but our bureaucratic system continues to strictly calculate the number of days they are present in Taiwan each year -- not because Taiwanese people are ruthless or ignorant of repaying their favors, but because the bureaucratic system is much too rigid. This proves how bureaucracy can kill people.
After several lawmakers addressed appeals from foreigners who had contributed to society in Taiwan, the government finally paid attention to the issue with a conclusion that lawmakers can propose amendments to Article 23 of the Immigration Law (
Amending the Immigration Law may resolve pressing needs for Gislefoss and Brougham, but similar situations are still likely to occur in the future and we might have to once again confront the dilemma of amending the law.
To commend these foreigners' sacrifices and love of Taiwan while shrewdly calculating the number of days they stay in Taiwan annually, only reveals Taiwan's stingy attitude and the way its bureaucracy operates. The government should grant these individuals ROC citizenship as special cases without the need to amend laws, fulfilling their wishes to spend the rest of their lives in Taiwan.
This will not only clearly show the gratitude of the Taiwanese people, but also make the world understand that loving Taiwan is restriction-free.
Jan Shou-jung is an assistant to Taiwan Independence Party legislator Lee Ching-hsiung.
Translated by Jackie Lin
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS