Since the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington earlier this month, the response from Taiwan has mostly consisted of vigorous tongue-lashing against the US and its lenient treatment of terrorists. From a humanitarian point of view, such an attitude is problematic.
Certainly, the US has provoked much hatred in the past in its self-proclaimed role as the world's policeman. But would the world fare any better without the US?
South Korea and Taiwan would not only have been lost to Communist rule, but also ground to utter poverty by various other horrific movements. Even Western Europe could have fallen long ago. The collapse of Communist regimes in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union would not have occurred. China, moreover, would have had to forget about today's reforms and affluence -- it could have come under Soviet nuclear attack in the 1960s.
The US has certainly been biased in Israel's favor in its Middle Eastern policy, but it has not fired a single shot in that conflict, which is the result of a bloody war between Israel and its neighbors. The US attacks on Iraq were provoked by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. The allied troops did not invade Iraqi
territory.
The idea of a conflict between Arab-Islamic and Western-Christian civilizations is therefore a delusion. In fact, most Islamic leaders are condemning the savage attacks on civilians.
Why, then, are some among Taiwan's media ignoring these facts and condemning the US? The main reason has been a misinterpretation of Beijing's anti-Americanism, and the belief that any misfortune that befalls the US is good.
Setting aside the massive damage done to China's economy by that misfortune, we should note that the Beijing government immediately sided with the US and condemned the terrorists. Beijing has even suppressed its own domestic anti-American rhetoric. Why? Because China itself has suffered from more than 100 bombings a year committed by Xinjiang separatists.
Have the pro-Beijing, anti-American people in Taiwan who applaud the terrorist attacks thought about these at all?
Since the incidents, various US government officials have repeatedly called on the public not to bear any hostility toward Muslims and Arabs, but to treat them fairly. US president George W. Bush visited some mosques, Congress introduced legislation to protect Muslims and Arabs and a judge in Georgia postponed a final ruling against a Muslim defendant, describing the current atmosphere as not conducive to a fair verdict.
These actions all illustrate that the US has not lost its rationality. this is in stark contrast to the barbaric behavior of terrorists who treat civilians like dogs -- behavior that indicates their level of "humanity."
The terrorists behind the attacks on New York and Washington represent neither Islamic civilization nor Arab people. The teachings of Islam are of peace and compassion. That is why most Muslims in the world have opposed both the terrorists and the Taliban regime of Afghanistan, which oppresses women and destroyed the giant Buddha statues of Bamiyan.
The war between the US and the terrorists is therefore clearly not a conflict between civilizations. There is much in US foreign policy, especially toward the Middle East, that needs to be reviewed. But it should not be put on par with the brutal butchering of civilians. Otherwise, how can one answer to one's own rationality and conscience? The nature of this tragedy should be made absolutely clear. As British Prime Minister Tony Blair said, this was not an attack on the US, it was an attack on civilization.
Pu Ta-chung is a political commentator in Taipei.
Translated by Francis Huang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS