Nothing can make Tuesday's attacks in the US forgivable. But something is needed to make them understandable.
We do not, at the time of writing, know who is responsible for the attacks. The US' favorite bogeyman, fugitive Saudi financier Osama bin Laden, is a key suspect, but bin Laden has said that while he is thankful for the attacks he is not responsible for them. With even his Taliban protectors saying they are willing to give him up to US justice if the Americans can show evidence of his involvement, protesting innocence is only prudent. But there are several other possible suspects: Islamic Jihad, Hamas, some radical PLO splinter group, or, seeing that the scale of the attacks and the degree of coordination suggest state-level intervention, the Iranians or Saddam Hussein.
Given that the US would dearly like to go to war with someone over Tuesday's events, even their most belligerent opponents are keeping their heads down. "It's too early to say we know who did it," the Associated Press quoted Gene Poteat, a former CIA scientific analyst, now president of Association of Former Intelligence Officers, as saying. "It's very clear that it's hatred of the United States that is behind [the attacks]."
Obviously. The problem is at the moment that along with the whodunit there is so much fulmination as the US intends to "hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts" -- according to President George W. Bush -- because as Secretary of State Colin Powell says: "You don't attack America like this and get away with it."
The more the pity then that rational people are not asking themselves why the US should be so hated. Yet the catalogue of suspects alone points to the probable reason like an arrow. The US is hated by a substantial number of people because of its hypocrisy and duplicity in the Middle East.
The reality of the situation is ill-served by talking of cowardice -- it takes some courage, however misguided, to fly a plane into a building -- or even evil, as the willful taking of human life must necessarily be seen.
The US portrays itself as a beacon of hope, freedom and liberty. If it lived up to its self-image, why would anybody hate it? The problem is that to the average Palestinian refugee, his land stolen by the state of Israel, condemned to exile in a Middle Eastern diaspora or the filth and poverty of the West Bank and Gaza, America is none of those things. Rather it is the mighty backer of the regime that stole his land and shoots his children and condemns him to a hopeless struggle to survive. No wonder there were reports of rejoicing in the streets of Nablus and East Jerusalem yesterday.
During the Cold War the US was unashamedly partisan. The Cold War ended, Oslo and the peace process came about, but unbelievably, things got worse. Washington pretends now to be an even-handed adjudicator of the rights and wrongs of both sides, yet it remains absolutely unable to condemn the vilest outrages by the Israeli authorities. Hypocrisy and duplicity.
As we said, this does not justify the terrible events of Tuesday, but it might explain it. Terrorist movements are born out of the reaction to historical unfairness that seems irremediable any other way. The prism of flattering self-image can be peculiarly distorting. Americans do not believe that they can be unjust, even in the Middle East, just as Englishmen cannot believe that their 800-year colonial occupation of Ireland was oppressive. But that is the uncomfortable -- and sometimes deadly -- reality. The wind is sown and the whirlwind is reaped.
If any good can come out of Tuesday's tragedy, then, let us hope that it's not the worldwide anti-terrorist crusade the US was promising yesterday but that those virtues which the US -- and other countries -- exalt, might be honored less often only in the breech.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS