Chinese Olympic Committee president Yuan Weimin (
By saying yes right away, Taiwan would have to accept the consequences. Flatly rejecting Beijing's request, on the other hand, risked provoking China and triggering a hysterical reaction.
Some people in Taiwan, however, acted too rashly. It was only proper that the Chinese-Taipei Olympic Committee should give Yuan a hearty welcome, but not that it pledged its support so quickly. Some people invoked nationalism to explain the rush to support Beijing's bid, others said backing Beijing could win eight years of peace at no cost.
A recent report in the United Daily News (
Germany held the Olympic Games in Berlin in 1936, under Adolf Hitler's leadership, to create a peaceful and serene image. In September 1939, Hitler ordered the invasion of Poland and started World War II. If the PRC attacked Taiwan one year after the 2008 Olympics, it would be turning its back even quicker than Hitler.
Some people believe that if Taiwan supports China's hosting the Games, cross-strait relations will improve and China will alter the deadline. Let's again review history.
In September 1990, one year after the Tiananmen Square Incident (
But when Taiwan applied in 1995 to host the 2002 Games in Kaohsiung, Beijing was firm in its objections. Beijing had Juan Antonio Samaranch, president of the International Olympic Committee, exert pressure upon other members. What was originally to have been a secret ballot became an open vote. The countries which supported Kaohsiung but feared retaliation by China had no choice but to vote for Pusan, South Korea. Kaohsiung lost to Pusan by a vote of 37-5.
When it needs others' backing, Beijing will mouth the sweetest words. But "politics first" seems to win in most situations, as evident during Kaohsiung's bid and when former president Lee Teng-hui (
However, the recent "City-to-City Forum" (
In 1990, Taiwan demonstrated its goodwill by supporting Beijing's Asian Games. At that time, despite the international economic sanctions imposed on the PRC because of the Tiananmen Square massacre, some businesspeople from Taiwan continued to invest in China. Cross-strait relations, however, did not improve. Indeed, China repaid Taiwan by performing large-scale military drills and launching ballistic missiles near the island.
If the PRC believes in nationalism, it should discard Marxism-Leninism. How is that the PRC government can have slaughtered tens of millions of Chinese? How is it that the Tiananmen massacre could occur? How can it be possible that President Jiang Zemin (
Beijing should host the Olympics -- with Taiwan's help -- but not now. Beijing must first build a peaceful, fair, humane, corruption-free country and then it will have a truly patriotic image.
Paul Lin is a political commentator currently based in New York.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS