Despite criticism from Academia Sinica President Lee Yuan-tseh
The new technology consultation task force -- besides being criticized by Lee and other professionals for being redundant -- has in fact seriously violated the current system of national science development.
According to the Basic Law of Science and Technology
According to the law, the National Science Council (NSC,
The NSC's development plan must be discussed and reviewed by a national science and technology conference
After following the above procedure, Taiwan's first official "Science and Technology White Paper"
Ironically, according to Vice President Annette Lu
Moreover, in addition to the NSC and the Academia Sinica, the Executive Yuan has already a "Science and Technology Advisory Group"
Then there is the problem of finding qualified people to serve on the new task force.
Since the old advisory group had already hired Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (TSMC) chairman Morris Chang
Chen's stubborn insistence on establishing the new advisory group also makes us suspect that its purpose is simply to endorse his science policies.
To be the leader of a nation, a strong will is indeed necessary. More important, however, is to have the courage to pull back from bad decisions or policies before it is too late.
Establishing the new technology consultation task force was a bad decision. Chen may lose face if he chooses to abolish the new advisory group immediately. His courage, however, will earn him more respect in the long run.
Huang Hsien-Chou is a KMT legislator and the convener of the Sci-Tech and Information Committee at the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase