Taiwan's democracy is in the midst of the most trying period of its young life.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
In the absence of outside threats and interference, formal independence would surely be the top choice for most Taiwanese. Simply put, it's the unavoidable development of a growing democracy. Therefore, any attempt at eradicating the idea of Taiwan's independence is tantamount to putting a straitjacket on Taiwan's democracy itself.
Lien's playing footsie with Beijing on the "One China" principle is an act of treachery, whether he is legally prosecuted or not. But his selling out of democracy to a despotic collective made evident his contempt for the former.
The common thread of all three "accomplishments" underscores his resolve to subvert Taiwan's democracy in cahoots with his Beijing handlers. Depending on how much other pan-blue leaders fall in line behind him, a new wave of assault on democracy could ensue.
Most likely, the Legislative Yuan, in which the pan-blue camp currently enjoys a majority, would be cranked up another notch in an attempt to further paralyze the government of President Chen Shui-bian (
Foremost among their goals is to accentuate the inefficiency of democracy. Taiwan's democracy could then be so insidiously discredited that the gap of living a regular life within a democracy (as in Taiwan) and without democracy (as in China), would seem to be narrowed.
But if the pan-blue leadership were to continue on the same obstructionist path after Lien's trip to Beijing, regular folks would soon realize that the pan-blue leaders, now in full and overt collaboration with Beijing, intend to destabilize Chen's government and bring about the surrender of Taiwan to China.
These people know that if Taiwan were to become a second Hong Kong, they would fare even worse -- likely much worse -- ? than today's Hong Kong people. The only ones that would enjoy special privileges would be pan-blue leaders.
As soon as people reach that conclusion, they -- ? including pan-blue supporters, with the exception of those marginal die-hards -- ? would turn against the pan-blue leaders. By that time the initial euphoria of seeing the image of the KMT making up with the Chinese Communist Party and the accompanying false sense of approaching peace would have evaporated, replaced by the anxiety of the prospect of losing, once and for all, the hard-earned freedom of choice.
Between China and Taiwan, freedom will prove to be the one gap that can't be narrowed.
Ultimately, it's the fear of irreversibly losing freedom -- ? the other face of democracy -- that could play a major role in bringing Taiwan back from the brink.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS