Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan's (
Lien's political gamble that started with such scenes of violence demonstrated the domestic political crisis is much greater than the cross-strait crisis. Lien's real aim is to win China's support for his struggle against President Chen Shui-bian (
Before the people of Taiwan reach a consensus on the China issue, any political move that attempts to make peace or unite with Beijing will only deepen disagreement and hatred in society. For example, when Lien and his delegation received red-carpet treatment in Nanjing on Tuesday, perhaps they were proud and self-satisfied, but people with strong Taiwan consciousness felt humiliated as they watched Lien's smirking on TV, and could only have felt deeply hurt. After all, China has only recently passed an "Anti-Secession" Law, which legitimizes the use of military force against this country.
This is the source of Tuesday's violence -- the fact that satisfying Lien's vanity comes at the cost of the humiliation of the Taiwanese people. This humiliation will only deepen feelings of hatred and will certainly never facilitate cross-strait peace.
A greater cause for anxiety is that Lien is using this trip to insinuate Beijing further into Taiwan's domestic disputes. In the past, come election time, China could only use military and verbal threats to support the pan-blue camp from the sidelines. But China's recent proposal to purchase Taiwan's agricultural produce -- made during KMT Vice Chairman Chiang Pin-kun's (
There are mutual benefits to be had for both China and the KMT from these visits. Beijing is clearly willing to throw its money around. If it can buy enough votes, it can help the KMT return to power, where, as a Beijing puppet, it will smooth the way to "peaceful unification." This is an attempt at electoral fraud on an international scale, and the government should bring this situation before the court of international opinion.
Lien should remember that in 1995, then Chinese president Jiang Zemin's (
Since that time, China has not softened its position, and has just passed a law legitimizing the use of force against Taiwan. So why has Lien been in such a hurry to suck up to China, since the KMT is not in power? The answer is clear -- his overweening ambition. Does the dignity of this nation have to be sacrificed to assuage Lien's long history of electoral failure?
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS