China's anti-Japanese campaign has been growing. The major reason behind it is to stop Japan from becoming a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Other issues such as textbook changes and "comfort women" are mere excuses.
China's loudest campaign slogan is: A Japan that does not review its invasion of China and that has no credibility in Asia is absolutely not qualified to represent Asia on the council. In fact, Beijing has already shown its support for Germany, which is also currently striving for a permanent seat.
Japan-US alliance
This is because the US and Japan are the largest obstacles to China's "unification."
In early February, the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee even publicly stated for the very first time that it would "encourage the peaceful resolution of issues concerning the Taiwan Strait through dialogue."
In light of the positive relations between Taiwan and Japan at the moment, China believes that Japan may "collude" with the US if it becomes a permanent member of the security council, making the issue of Taiwan tougher.
This is why Beijing has launched a large-scale anti-Japanese movement. In other words, it has linked historical problems to Japan's bid for a permanent seat.
Further, issues such as the sovereignty dispute over the Diaoyutai Islands, and the conflicts over oil and gas development in the East China Sea, add to China's desire that Japan not become a leading political power.
All of these factors are closely related to the two countries' national security and energy strategy.
Political pressure
Obviously, if Japan becomes a permanent member and stands side-by-side with the US in international politics, the political pressure on China will become greater.
As a result, it may be difficult to restrain China's anti-Japanese sentiment.
Last Sunday, Japanese Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura arrived in Beijing for an exchange of opinions with Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星).
Today, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi will attend an Asia-Africa summit in Indonesia, and he is expected to meet Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
They will certainly talk about the current anti-Japanese protests.
The anti-Japanese movement will inevitably affect the two countries' trade and economies. In recent years, Japan has sold an enormous amount of steel to China.
compatible economies
Some Japanese people have even said that China saved Japan's steel industry.
Nevertheless, China has also made a fortune from Japan. While it makes use of Japan's capital and technology, Japan also leverages China's relatively cheap laborer and materials. So the two countries are economically complementary to each other.
Still, it may be hard to remedy historical hatred and ethnic emotions in a short period of time. Sino-Japanese relations may improve after the meeting between Hu and Koizumi, but China's anti-Japanese sentiment is like a ticking bomb that may explode at anytime.
The situation depends completely on Japan's introspection and efforts, as well as China's self-restraint.
Chen Peng-jen is the director of the Graduate Institute of Japanese Studies at Chinese Culture University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS