For the first time in living memory, a Japanese leader has demanded that China apologize, this for anti-Japanese vandalism that has raged through several Chinese cities, including throwing rocks at the Japanese embassy in Beijing while police looked on.
The challenge from Tokyo was yet more evidence of Japan's emergence from the passive and pacifist cocoon in which it had wrapped itself since its crushing defeat in World War II 60 years ago. Since then, Japan has almost always taken what the Japanese call "low posture" in its dealings with China and other Asian nations that it invaded during the days that militarists dominated in Tokyo.
Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura summoned Chinese Ambassador Wang Yi (
The New York Times reported that Wang had not apologized. Press reports from Beijing said Chinese authorities were indignant at the Japanese demand and contended that the Japanese brought the criticism and outbursts on themselves.
Until now, Japan has responded to such confrontations with a public wringing of hands, a symbolic bow from the waist, and a muted expression of regret. Mainly, the Japanese have hoped that the issue at hand would be resolved by having it fade away with the passage of time.
Over the years, the failure of the Japanese to stand up and assert themselves has caused China and South Korea, which has been moving to align itself with China, to become all the more aggressive in their attitude and posture toward Japan.
In addition, Japanese governments have been reluctant to publicize their expressions of regret for the pain and suffering caused by Japanese militarists from 1930 to 1945. Nor have the Japanese sought to take credit for the substantial economic aid they have rendered to China and other Asian nations.
It remains to be seen whether Machimura's new posture will be sustained. If it is, that could most likely be attributed to a generational change in Japan. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Foreign Minister Machimura, and many other Japanese political leaders comprise a true postwar generation of Japanese who have no personal memory of World War II . Japanese in this generation appear to feel less obligated to take "low posture" toward other Asians.
Another leader, Shinzo Abe, of the Liberal Democratic Party, took a position on a TV program last Sunday that would have been unthinkable five years ago, pointing to anger over internal Chinese problems as causing the outbursts against Japan.
"Japan is an outlet to vent that anger," Abe was quoted in the New York Times.
Because of the anti-Japanese education there, it's easy to light the fire of these demonstrations and, because of the Internet, it's easy to assemble a lot of people.
China's rulers have been using the anti-Japanese eruptions, which could have occurred only with government approval in China, to divert attention from issues such as widespread unemployment and under employment. About 40 percent of the Chinese labor force is either out of work or working only enough to get by.
About 125 million people in China, a group as large as the population of Japan, have been reported to be in motion every day looking for work. Peasants have repeatedly rioted in rural areas.
Among the immediate issues that have stirred anti-Japanese demonstrations, which included charging into department stores to sweep Japanese goods off the shelves, has been Tokyo's bid to become a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council along with the US, Britain, France, Russia, and China.
Beijing has been determined to block that bid and underscored its opposition to Japan's appeal this week by endorsing India's effort to become a permanent member. Brazil and Germany have also sought such membership.
Beijing has vigorously objected to the recent "Common Strategic Objectives" set out by the US and Japan. That agreement includes Japan's assurance that it will help defend the island of Taiwan if China seeks to conquer it by force.
Japan took control of Taiwan after the Sino-Japanese war of 1895. After World War II, Japan renounced sovereignty over Taiwan but did not determine to whom sovereignty passed, contending that was for the victorious allied nations to decide.
Beijing, which asserts that Taiwan belongs to China, has long demanded that Japan recognize China's claim to Taiwan. Japan has refused to comply, which once caused the late premier of China, Chou Enlai(
Richard Halloran is a writer base in Hawaii.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS