Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) is expected to make a visit to China by the end of this month. It is truly sad to see the KMT and Lien stubbornly proceeding with the trip, disregarding repeated warnings about its bad timing and the potential harm to the nation's interests.
What does Lien realistically hope to accomplish with his trip? One cannot help but wonder. KMT Vice Chairman Chiang Pin-kun (
After that trip, Chen Shui-bian's (
On Friday, both Premier Frank Hsieh (
Perhaps the KMT thought that, since the pan-blue camp has a legislative majority, it could forcibly enact into law any agreement it reaches with Beijing. That only goes to show what little respect the KMT has for the law and the government. As with any other country in the world, only the executive branch of the government is empowered and authorized to negotiate and enter into agreement with other governments and countries.
Even Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had to admit yesterday that the likelihood of Lien signing an agreement to formally end the civil war between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is small, because government approval would be required.
It's true that the KMT and CCP signed various pacts and agreements during the Chinese Civil War, before the KMT went into exile in Taiwan. But it must be remembered that the KMT was not just a political party, but the nominal ruling regime in China. So it had the capacity to enter into such agreements with the CCP, which was then considered by the KMT a "rebel" group. The problem is that the KMT seems unwilling -- and perhaps unable -- to accept the reality that it is now just an opposition party in Taiwan.
Lien has reportedly agreed to speak with President Chen on the phone before his trip, despite the fact that Chen asked to meet with him personally. Perhaps the KMT is hoping that a phone conservation will give Lien the needed authorization, or at least the appearance of it.
The DPP government must not be pressured by Lien into authorizing him to accept terms and conditions that the government isn't ready to accept. After the passage of the "Anti-Secession" Law, extreme caution must be taken when dealing with cross-strait affairs.
Without authorization from the Taiwan government to accept terms and conditions on its behalf, and without the ability to make concessions to Beijing, one can hardly imagine what constructive purpose Lien's trip will serve. Perhaps Lien believes that he can woo the CCP into unilaterally withdrawing all the missiles targeting Taiwan, and promising to never again re-deploy them against Taiwan.
If that is the case, then he's deluding himself even more than usual. And if his sole purpose is to have tea with Chinese officials, then the trip is utterly meaningless.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,