During the early stages of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government's rule it seems there were many sympathizers of the CCP among British intelligentsia because of the perceived fascism and corruption of Chiang Kai-shek's (
People in the UK are not naturally sympathetic to the CCP, or to communism in general, and the events in the Soviet Union at the time of the Cold War reinforced this on our doorstep. However, due to the KMT's quasi-fascist nature, the CCP was seen as the lesser of two evils because of the bigger threat of Nazism than Soviet communism on the UK.
There were and are, many Western academics who tried to argue that Chinese communism was different. I believe that in the early years there were noble people who joined the CCP and this must not be forgotten, but the Cultural Revolution, Tiananmen Square massacre and today's lack of freedom of information, expression and speech in the People's Republic of China have irreversibly tarnished that view.
On the other hand, unfortunately, Taiwan's general image in the UK is still one of being a place where many toys and such goods are made (in the average British person's eyes). As Taiwan's democracy grows and develops, the Taiwanese representative office in the UK needs to do more to make known its democracy in the European psyche.
Additionally, is communism illegal in Taiwan? As part of the democratization process, communism needs to be accepted by Taiwanese as a legitimate voice in a pluralistic society. I'm sure that Taiwanese are mature enough to handle this and it would send a mature signal to Beijing that Taiwan has a superior moral argument over the CCP.
Roy Wilson
United Kingdom
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,