In January, the Allies commemorated the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz by Russian troops. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder did an exemplary job in leading the commemorations, finding the right words of atonement for the horrors perpetrated by the German Nazis.
After World War II, the general cry in devastated Germany was nie wieder -- "never again" will we allow a dictatorial regime to push us towards the precipice of so much destruction and human suffering.
It is thus perplexing that Schroeder's Germany is pushing ahead in the direction of another Holocaust, this one in far-away Asia. We are referring to Germany's leading role in the EU's proposed lifting of the arms embargo against China.
China today has many similarities with pre-World War II Germany: A strong economy and a booming military-industrial complex, strong nationalism, a feeling of having been wronged, and an expansionist view vis-a-vis its smaller neighbors.
The Nazis annexed neighboring countries while the rest of Western Europe looked the other way, and tried to appease Germany. The nadir was British prime minister Neville Chamberlain's trip to Munich in September 1938, and his proclamation of "peace in our time." Germany occupied all of Czechoslovakia just months later, and then invaded Poland.
Just like the British and French in those days, Europe today insufficiently realizes that China's recent movements strongly indicate that it intends to use force against a small, peaceful and democratic neighbor, Taiwan.
With its "one China" unification policy, China is using precisely the same methods regarding Taiwan as Hitler's Germany did with Austria back in 1938.
In the past few years, China's military budget has grown by between 12 percent and 18 percent a year -- while the budgets of all other nations in the region have remained stable or even decreased. China has purchased advanced Mig aircraft, Kilo-class submarines and Sovremenny destroyers from Russia.
Just this past Monday, the rubber-stamp National Peoples Congress passed an "Anti-Secession" Law, mandating the use of force by the People's Liberation Army in case Taiwan wants to remain free and democratic instead of "reuniting" with a Communist China of which it was never a part, even for one day.
All this should have given the EU pause for reflection. But the EU seems to be charging ahead toward lifting the arms embargo anyway. This is all the more peculiar, because it was the EU which accused US President George W. Bush of charging ahead with the Iraq invasion without proper thought of what he would do afterwards. Now the EU seems to be making a similar mistake.
What would be the right way forward? The EU should immediately stop its headlong rush into lifting the arms embargo. Trade relations between the EU and China can proceed equally well without lifting the embargo. China can be a respected nation and a full member of the world community without any arms purchases, from Europe or elsewhere.
But the EU can do more: It can use its new-found leverage with China to impress on the leaders in Beijing that peaceful coexistence between China and Taiwan as two friendly neighboring states is the solution that will win Beijing respect around the world.
The EU could start by building up direct contacts with the democratically elected government of Taiwan and working toward normalization of relations with the island. In the context of the UN, it could start by urging an end to Taiwan's isolation and work towards the nation's full membership to the world body on the basis of the right to self-determination in the UN Charter.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS