China's plans to fatten its military budget this year are part of a long-term pattern but they will still worry Taiwan and likely stiffen US opposition to Europe lifting an arms export embargo on China, analysts say.
China announced last Friday that it would boost military spending 12.6 percent this year to 247.7 billion yuan (US$29.9 billion).
Jiang Enzhu (
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
By comparison, the US defense budget is about US$400 billion this year.
"Although a 12.6 percent increase sounds quite substantial, it is not extraordinary for China," said Christan Lemiere, analyst at London-based defense analysts Jane's.
"Over the last 15 years, it increased its defense budget by double digit figures every year [except] one," Lemiere said.
Because of a rapidly rising cost of living in China, Beijing had to fund higher defence pay and the introduction of social security for retirees, he said.
However, it was important to note that the budget excluded many items affecting regional security such as overseas procurement of defense equipment.
In any case, the official Chinese defense budget was not believed to represent actual military spending; many analysts believed the true figure was two to three times larger, he said.
According to Washington, Lemiere said, Chinese military spending amounted to US$50 billion to US$70 billion last year.
"Rising Chinese defense expenditures [are] a concern for regional powers -- Taiwan, India, Japan -- and the United States but I don't think this particular announcement will have much of an effect," Lemiere said.
"People have been expecting China to increase its budget as they have been doing for the 15 years. There will be no direct reaction to it but obviously Taiwan will try to continue to source [equipment] from overseas, primarily the United States," he said.
The Chinese announcement "may lead to some rhetoric from the US about the embargo," Lemiere said.
US President George W. Bush, on a visit to Brussels last month, voiced "deep concern" at EU plans to lift a 15-year arms embargo on China, despite a European scheme to toughen a voluntary code of conduct on such exports.
EU leaders have indicated that the arms embargo is likely to be lifted under the bloc's current Luxembourg president, which ends in June.
The US says this will give China access to high-tech military know-how and firepower that would threaten Taiwan and shift the strategic balance in East Asia.
"I assume that the people who are already opposed to lifting this arms embargo will use this as an additional reason for attacking this decision," said Lu Yiyi, analyst at the London-based Royal Institute of International Affairs.
But much would depend on how China used the money.
"It depends on exactly how the additional money will be spent ... if they say it is for new uniforms for the army, [for] improving salaries for army officers, then it is very different from purchasing new equipment," Lu said.
China had previously said it would use the money to fund demobilizing troops. Last Friday, the NPC spokesman said Beijing would demobilize 200,000 soldiers this year.
The People's Liberation Army is the world's largest standing army, with some 2.5 million members.
New tensions with Taiwan were "inevitable," Li said.
"Inevitably, because there is an increase in military budget, Taiwan will feel alarmed," the analyst said.
The NPC is expected to pass legislation aimed at preventing Taiwan from declaring formal independence.
Francois Godement, director of the Asia Centre at the French Institute of International Relations, noted that the Chinese military budget had been growing every since 1989, except for 2003.
Every military update -- stronger navy, battlefield electronics, a new paratrooper division -- "indicates that Taiwan is the target," he said.
"But, because of China's heavy dependence on energy and its great export and import needs, all things that travel by sea, it is normal that China should raise its naval profile," he said.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS