China's plans to fatten its military budget this year are part of a long-term pattern but they will still worry Taiwan and likely stiffen US opposition to Europe lifting an arms export embargo on China, analysts say.
China announced last Friday that it would boost military spending 12.6 percent this year to 247.7 billion yuan (US$29.9 billion).
Jiang Enzhu (
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
By comparison, the US defense budget is about US$400 billion this year.
"Although a 12.6 percent increase sounds quite substantial, it is not extraordinary for China," said Christan Lemiere, analyst at London-based defense analysts Jane's.
"Over the last 15 years, it increased its defense budget by double digit figures every year [except] one," Lemiere said.
Because of a rapidly rising cost of living in China, Beijing had to fund higher defence pay and the introduction of social security for retirees, he said.
However, it was important to note that the budget excluded many items affecting regional security such as overseas procurement of defense equipment.
In any case, the official Chinese defense budget was not believed to represent actual military spending; many analysts believed the true figure was two to three times larger, he said.
According to Washington, Lemiere said, Chinese military spending amounted to US$50 billion to US$70 billion last year.
"Rising Chinese defense expenditures [are] a concern for regional powers -- Taiwan, India, Japan -- and the United States but I don't think this particular announcement will have much of an effect," Lemiere said.
"People have been expecting China to increase its budget as they have been doing for the 15 years. There will be no direct reaction to it but obviously Taiwan will try to continue to source [equipment] from overseas, primarily the United States," he said.
The Chinese announcement "may lead to some rhetoric from the US about the embargo," Lemiere said.
US President George W. Bush, on a visit to Brussels last month, voiced "deep concern" at EU plans to lift a 15-year arms embargo on China, despite a European scheme to toughen a voluntary code of conduct on such exports.
EU leaders have indicated that the arms embargo is likely to be lifted under the bloc's current Luxembourg president, which ends in June.
The US says this will give China access to high-tech military know-how and firepower that would threaten Taiwan and shift the strategic balance in East Asia.
"I assume that the people who are already opposed to lifting this arms embargo will use this as an additional reason for attacking this decision," said Lu Yiyi, analyst at the London-based Royal Institute of International Affairs.
But much would depend on how China used the money.
"It depends on exactly how the additional money will be spent ... if they say it is for new uniforms for the army, [for] improving salaries for army officers, then it is very different from purchasing new equipment," Lu said.
China had previously said it would use the money to fund demobilizing troops. Last Friday, the NPC spokesman said Beijing would demobilize 200,000 soldiers this year.
The People's Liberation Army is the world's largest standing army, with some 2.5 million members.
New tensions with Taiwan were "inevitable," Li said.
"Inevitably, because there is an increase in military budget, Taiwan will feel alarmed," the analyst said.
The NPC is expected to pass legislation aimed at preventing Taiwan from declaring formal independence.
Francois Godement, director of the Asia Centre at the French Institute of International Relations, noted that the Chinese military budget had been growing every since 1989, except for 2003.
Every military update -- stronger navy, battlefield electronics, a new paratrooper division -- "indicates that Taiwan is the target," he said.
"But, because of China's heavy dependence on energy and its great export and import needs, all things that travel by sea, it is normal that China should raise its naval profile," he said.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS