Beijing's new grand strategy is "dominating East Asia without fighting." This strategy incorporates diplomatic, defense, cross-strait and domestic policies. As these policies become increasingly integrated, the total advantages are augmented by way of synergy (one plus one exceeds two). Although Beijing may never openly admit it, one of its ultimate goals is to gradually take over the US' domination of East Asia through economic and cultural means without war. Beijing is rapidly building up its already advanced military capabilities to strengthen the effects of its extra-military instruments, such as diplomacy, even though it prefers to keep its military force prepared but not used.
This new grand strategy comprises seven important elements:
1. Defusing China's domestic "time bombs" -- the most urgent task: Such as handling and containing the proliferation of protest movements.
2. Putting cooperation above contradictions with US policies: While being frank about differences, Beijing strives to expand bilateral communications.
3. Actively implementing the "policy on neighboring countries": To make them feel rich, secure and friendly toward Beijing, and to replace East Asia's "China fear" with "China fever."
4. Elevating relations with the EU as a potential counterweight against the US: EU trade with China has exceeded that with the US since 2003. Naturally, the EU wishes to lift its arms embargo against China.
5. Developing rapidly and quietly "acupuncture warfare" (點穴戰) capabilities (being able to strike decisively at other countries' strategic points) and acquiring a survivable nuclear deterrent: If one holds a big stick and speaks softly, who does not listen?
6. Preferring extra-military approaches on Taiwan and being prepared to wait: Five days after Chinese President Hu Jintao (
7. Entering Latin America to check US expansion and entering Africa to replace the US: Last year, about half of China's foreign investment -- much involved in oil diplomacy -- was in Latin America. Beijing has used oil diplomacy in Africa as well to fill a vacuum left by the US.
Only one link in the chain of this grand strategy focuses on Taiwan. Hu's tactics will be more creative and multifarious:
1. Being prepared to wait: Beijing now believes that "the US strategic expansion will slow down" in a decade, and haste over the cross-strait solution is unnecessary. This is the greatest distinction between Hu's approaches and those of Jiang Zemin (
2. Emphasizing extra-military means: Apart from launching psychological warfare, legal warfare and media warfare on Taiwan, Hu may contain Taiwan on diplomatic, economic, cultural and even religious fronts.
3. Be harder on the Taipei government and softer on the Taiwanese people: Beijing denies the Taipei government opportunities to gain credit for alleviating cross-strait tension, as the current administration unambiguously rejects Beijing's "one China principle." Beijing seeks to exert pressure on Taipei indirectly through other means, especially Washington, to prevent Taipei from declaring de jure independence. Beijing, however, will be agile and pro-active in efforts to win the hearts and minds of the Taiwanese people.
Beijing's most favored option is to annex Taiwan without war. If a response to Taipei's move toward independence is required, Beijing's next option is "coercion on the brink" (
After Hu's supporters in the Communist Youth League and among Qinghua University alumni take up senior appointments in the Taiwan Affairs Office, a flexible approach in dealing with the Taiwan issue may emerge. An increasing number of semi-governmental academics have been studying the case of "one nation, three seats" held in the UN by the former Soviet Republic, Belarus and the Ukraine, the concept of "overlapping sovereignty," and the notion of a "United States of Chinese Republics."
US President George W. Bush has won a second presidential term with a shining victory. While subjectively his agenda is ambitious, objectively the surrounding conditions are no longer as favorable as four years ago. China's economy has grown dramatically, which has set in motion the ascendancy of China's cultural power. The two sides of the Taiwan Strait are becoming increasingly unbalanced. Furthermore, Beijing has never renounced its use of military force against Taiwan, and continues to suffocate Taiwan internationally, to degrade Taiwan's political status and to divide Taiwan's society. While wrestling with a giant, Taiwan must attain victory with wisdom.
Taiwan faces serious challenges today: Its economy may weaken, its diplomatic standing may slip, its social division may deteriorate, and its government may be further paralyzed. We must reduce internal attrition, and resort to our wisdom. Putting our house in order render us undefeatable. This is what we must do:
1. Prioritize our competing national goals: Political dignity, economic development and military security are what we all want, but in what order should they come?
2. Strengthen lateral communication within the ruling party and the government respectively: Only with improved internal coordination can we maximize our strength.
3. Promote harmony and consensus in society: Democracy is not simply "majority rule," "minority right" is equally important. In the legislature, the pan-blue camp should respect the pan-green camp. Among the general population, the pan-green supporters should respect the pan-blue supporters.
4. Stabilize Taiwan-US relations: Prior consultations are not self-demeaning and are standard behavior between friends in the international community. In consultation, one is entitled to expressing reservations and disagreements. It is much easier to advise the other party beforehand on unpleasant events than to explain difficulties afterwards.
5. Acquire asymmetrical warfare capabilities: Defense reform should emphasize elevating military scholarship, improving the understanding of our enemy, pluralizing promotion channels and internationalizing the outlook of our soldiers.
6. Implement a China policy of allying with the majority to check the minority: To win over 95.3 percent of the Chinese population (the people and the local elite) and to deal with the remaining 4.7 percent (the Communist Party and the central government). We should not, in a sweeping manner, treat everyone in China as an enemy.
Lin Chong-Pin is a professor in the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University, and the author of a recently published book Win With Wisdom: When Wrestling With A Giant.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS