A flurry of news dispatches from the Korean Peninsula over the last 10 days has provided fresh evidence that things are spiraling toward chaos at that end of President George W. Bush's "axis of evil."
US relations with South Korea continued to slide downhill with Seoul's publication of a strange "white paper" on defense.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
North Korea asserted that it has actually produced nuclear weapons and, by refusing to continue negotiations, showed that it has no intention of giving up its nuclear ambitions.
In the first case, South Korea's Ministry of National Defense alleged that, in the event of hostilities with North Korea, the US would deploy 690,000 troops, 2000 warplanes, and 160 warships to the defense of South Korea.
That statement was absurd on the face of it. The 690,000 troops would require sending the entire US Army and the entire US Marine Corps to Korea, leaving all other missions to the National Guard and Reserves. The 2000 warplanes would be more than three times the aircraft assigned to the Pacific Air Forces. The 160 ships would be about half of the US Navy.
This claim, which was presumptuous, not to say bizarre, implied that the government of President Roh Moo-hyun could not deal with the implications of the US decision to reduce its forces in South Korea and to revise the mission of those that remain. The primary task of the US forces will be to prepare for contingencies anywhere, not just to help defend South Korea.
The South Korean white paper indicated that Roh's defense ministry sought to assure South Koreans that the US would not abandon them. Ironically, that effort came atop rampant anti-Americanism in Seoul, an increasing tendency among young South Koreans to appease North Korea, and a growing South Korean preference for ties with China rather than the US.
As an Australian scholar and student of Northeast Asia put it, South Korean relations with the US are delicately poised between affirmation and severance.
An e-mail message to the defense ministry in Seoul seeking clarification was not answered by the time of this writing, which may have been because of a national holiday in South Korea. Even so, the defense ministry has not denied press reports that have been floating around for more than a week.
The ministry's English-language Web site announcing the release of its white paper did not mention the dispatch of US forces but focused on a change in terms. Instead of calling North Korea "the main enemy," the report noted North Korea's"conventional military power, weapons of mass destruction, and forward deployment of military forces." The headquarters of US Forces in South Korea professed to be unaware of the white paper despite articles in the South Korean press, the Associated Press, and on Chinese and Vietnamese TV news. "I have no information regarding this ROK document," said an officer speaking for the command. "However, as a matter of policy we do not discuss the contents or details of operational plans."
North Korea, along with Iraq and Iran, were included in the"axis of evil" by President Bush shortly after the terrorist assaults in New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001. By claiming that they have produced nuclear weapons, the North Koreans evidently sought to confirm what they had hinted at many times in the past. They also said they would not continue the six party talks intended to dissuade them from going nuclear. In those negotiations, the US, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, China, and Russia have held three previous meetings in Beijing.
Pyongyang claimed that North Korea has "manufactured nukes for self-defense to cope with the Bush administration's evermore undisguised policy to isolate and stifle the DPRK." The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is the official name of North Korea and "nukes" is slang for nuclear arms. The US has long contended that North Korea has nuclear weapons.
On negotiations, the North Koreans said: "We are compelled to suspend our participation in the talks for an indefinite period till we have recognized that there is justification for us to attend the talks and there are ample conditions and atmosphere to expect positive results from the talks." Whether that was a bargaining ploy remained to be seen.
Before its nuclear announcement, Pyongyang proclaimed: "If the US imperialists ignite flames of war, we will first of all strike all bases of US imperialist aggressors and turn them into a sea of fire." That thundering, too, repeated earlier belligerence.
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS